Search for: "Key v State"
Results 9921 - 9940
of 22,472
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2024, 9:37 am
As we previously reported here, on June 13, 2024, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 4:00 pm
Another problem is that the county will continue to send key documents to the owner of record. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:14 pm
Hall, No. 0713675 Denial of habeas relief to death row inmate is affirmed over claims that: 1) the district court erred in finding the State did not violate criminal-petitioner's constitutional rights by its failure to disclose an alleged deal with the State's key witness; 2) the district court erred in determining that the state court's resolution of criminal-petitioner's claim of ineffective assistance was reasonable; and 3) the district… [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 2:40 pm
State v. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 3:39 am
See, Kyllo v. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 8:01 am
Oklahoma, Michigan v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 2:02 pm
Yesterday the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit released its opinion in Latif v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
In a dramatically divided but decisively 6-3 decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
In a dramatically divided but decisively 6-3 decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 8:11 pm
Schachter v. [read post]
24 Jul 2022, 1:09 pm
Indeed, this specific language in the ECA was a key part of efforts to persuade state legislatures to overrule the popular vote in their states in 2020. [read post]
5 May 2020, 10:10 am
These recent decisions continue a long line of case law—including the maligned yet ubiquitous United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 3:31 pm
Constitution does under Roe v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
Lash has a sixty-page selection of post-ratification materials, including, for example, The Slaughter-House Cases and United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 8:04 am
USA LLC v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 1:48 am
In line with Lord Justice Jacob’s point in Actavis v Merck, the Court of Appeal stated that – in certain circumstances – there is nothing inventive about routinely-taken steps even if the actual outcome had not been predicted. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 4:09 pm
Anyway, on to Ali & Ibrahim v Birmingham City Council [2008] EWCA 1228. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
It was famously rejected in McCulloch v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 10:51 am
Justice Ginsburg with opinion in Moore v. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 4:04 pm
But of course the key question is what “strict scrutiny” means. [read post]
