Search for: "Mark A. Roberts"
Results 9921 - 9940
of 10,103
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2007, 1:26 pm
In the Washington Post, Bill Miller and Robert Barnes have this article; Cary O'Reilly of Bloomberg News reports here; and the ACS Blog has this post on the District Court's ruling in this case. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 12:11 am
As I say on the back of the book, "the historical evidence is complete and compelling" (Mark Tushnet uses the words "elegant, clearly presented, and persuasive"). [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 9:06 am
It's not like that editorial he marked. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 6:13 am
Kennedy Helm, III, Managing Partner and Chairman, Stites & Harbison Mark Wasserman, Managing Partner, Sutherland Asbill & Brennan The New Supply Chain: Contract Lawyers, Outsourcing, and Other Alternatives Ralph Baxter … [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 12:05 am
.
Law Schools' Supreme Court Clinics Make Their Mark
Legal Times
Just three years ago the Stanford Law School Supreme Court Litigation Clinic, the first of its kind, filed its inaugural petition with the Supreme Court. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 2:22 am
".The IPKat notes that these were criminal proceedings, but the report does not clarify whether they relate to offences under trade mark law or under the general criminal law. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 12:27 am
Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (Mark D. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 8:24 am
Nothing more than a denial of certiorari, meaning the case is now over.The reliability test was only part of Roberts, so we do not need to revive the debate about when Roberts died, but the decision yesterday is a reminder of how much confrontation doctrine keeps changing.And Phil Pucillo, of Ave Maria School of Law, now but regrettably not for long of Ann Arbor, had this to say in response (and has also given me permission to post it here):I just glanced at the New Mexico Supreme… [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 11:57 am
Cooper, Professor, Mark O. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 10:19 pm
After Blackstone's $39 billion purchase of Equity Office Properties deal was topped in deal size by Kohlberg Kravis Roberts' bid for Texas Pacific Group (TXU) for about $45 billion, it almost seems like everyone yawns at "mere" billion dollar deals, much less something smaller. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 9:55 am
It has many outstanding participants - Mark Lagon and David Shorr on the UN; Gary Schmitt and Michael Schiffer on China; Ivo Daalder and Robert Kagan on America and the Use of Force; Michael O'Hanlon and Frederick Kagan on Iraq and US military strength - you can see the full list at the Stanley Foundation website. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 8:21 am
Roberts added, "that it is part of keeping the commercial enterprise viable. [read post]
3 Mar 2007, 4:06 pm
Counsel for the entrepreneurial defendant in this all-Sandra grudge match: SCt Today alum Mark Stancil. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 4:33 pm
Absurd punitive damages judgments will be fewer as a result of this absolutely correct decision by the new Roberts-led United States Supreme Court.It is a court burdened by the legacy of an ineffectual and inconsistent Rehnquist Court, whose main mark is "unfinished business" in a legal system left in turmoil, lagging far behind modern technological developments and unprepared judicially for the digital age. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 12:46 pm
In the Wall Street Journal, Mark H. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 4:11 am
"New DealsThursday, March 1, 2007By Janine Friend"In a deal that will mark the biggest leveraged buyout ever, a private equity group led by Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. and Texas Pacific Group have taken energy and power producer TXU Corp. private for $45 billion. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 2:27 pm
Roberts was made for that job. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 12:58 am
Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Mark W. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 2:59 pm
Mahoney is incredibly impressive as a lawyer and advocate; people who call her the "female John Roberts" aren't too far off the mark. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 9:34 pm
" by Irish scholar, sage and legal consultant Robert Clark;* A note on the new US trade mark dilution statute by John L. [read post]
