Search for: "Sales v. State"
Results 9921 - 9940
of 21,169
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2014, 9:57 pm
Effective immediately upon the entry of this Consent Order, uPI will not import into the United States, sell for importation into the United States, or sell or offer for sale in the United States after importation, or knowingly aid, abet, encourage, participate in, or induce importation into the United States, the sale for importation into the United States, or the sale, offer for sale, or use in the United… [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
In 1913, California was one of the first States to prohibit the sale and possession of marijuana, and at the end of the century, California became the first State to authorize limited use of the drug for medicinal purposes. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 10:41 am
Case citation: Perkins v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 10:18 am
Cargill Inc. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 10:15 am
After Dismissal Court Lacked Subject-matter Jurisdiction Magloire v. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 4:30 am
Nothing to do with us, mate – Google and Facebook http://t.co/pfKbOL0sLe -> Dotcom Loses Lawyers – Then They Erase All History of Him http://t.co/pU34G2RkGR -> Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2014-11-12: Supreme Court of Canada to rule on role of good faith in co… http://t.co/Uhxaty3mI3 -> blogged: Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2014-11-12 http://t.co/hD2LLSRThd -> Supreme Court of Canada ‘updates’ common law to make good faith an implied… [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 6:00 pm
In short order, the state lifted stop-sale orders and ended the investigation without issuing any penalties, citing the company’s rapid response to the investigation. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 1:45 pm
In Mizuno v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 8:40 am
Case Citation: Doe v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 8:31 am
NationsBank and Judice v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 8:18 am
To determine whether an entity is an “arm of the state,” the Eleventh Circuit evaluated four factors outlined in Manders v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 1:14 am
Attorney Preet Bharara stated: “The charges unsealed today describe a sweeping and cynical fraud. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 11:26 am
The Pennsylvania case is Wisniewski v. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 10:58 am
–State v. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 8:18 am
” Brockman offered Oklahoma Tax Commission v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 12:53 pm
He made no sales during his employment. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 10:11 am
(See United States of America v. 1.41 Acres of Land (N.D. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 9:36 am
Brunner v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 9:06 am
In Brown v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 9:02 am
Holder, 759 F.3d 977 (9th Cir. 2014), the state statute is divisible under Deschamps and a modified categorical approach could be used.US v. [read post]
