Search for: "State of New York v. United States"
Results 9921 - 9940
of 16,016
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2011, 7:15 pm
BergChapter 8The Story of New York Times Co. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am
State of California, Department of Motor Vehicles (2023) 88 Cal. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 4:10 am
Kim v. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 7:00 am
In a story published this weekend in the New York Times, Michael Schmidt writes about President Trump's frustrations in April 2018 when Attorney General Jeff Sessions refused to prosecute Hillary Clinton and Jim Comey (presumably because there was no evidentiary basis for such prosecutions). [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 9:03 am
For more on a similar incident from New York in 2014, see this story. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 5:18 am
Brief for the United States of America, U.S. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 8:31 am
” And here’s how various media outlets covered it at the time: The New York Times: “An unusual question is capturing the attention of cyberspecialists, Russia experts and Democratic leaders in Philadelphia: Is Vladimir V. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:07 am
The Health Plan Excess Fee Case Filed Against Johnson and Johnson In Lewandowski v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 7:06 am
District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 7:30 am
In particular, the “Five Eyes”— The United States, New Zealand, Australia, the United Kingdom, and Canada— share citizen data amongst themselves - providing loopholes that might undermine national legislation. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 4:00 pm
Courts have limited who can be put to death and outlawed some execution procedures, while New York's court of appeals even ruled the state death penalty law unconstitutional. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
Watch our new Board Diversity at Corporations Video, by Ellen V. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 12:21 pm
Ct. 1640 (2010) (Apr. 21, 2010), the United States Supreme Court held that a plan adminstrator’s discretionary authority to interpret a plan is entitled to deference, even if a prior determination with regard to the same claim was invalid.Estate planning with retirement assetsArnstein & LehrFor many individuals, retirement benefits represent a significant portion of their wealth.Second Circuit finds that class arbitration waiver clause is unconscionable, refuses to compel… [read post]
24 Jun 2006, 4:48 pm
The Supreme Court held in United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am
United States, 431 U.S. 291 (1977) (same, despite Justice Stevens’ argument in dissent, id. at 317, 321, that obscenity law should only be enforceable through civil remedies); New York v. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 5:21 am
Squire Sanders & Dempsey LLPOn August 18, 2010 the US Securities and Exchange Commission issued Release No 33-9135, a cease and desist order (the Order) settling claims against the state of New Jersey as a result of what the SEC determined was inadequate disclosure of the financial condition of New Jersey's pension funds.Health care reform — regulations issued on expanded internal/external claims review process for nongrandfathered group health plansHunton… [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 10:06 pm
In March 2007, Viacom sued YouTube and Google, Inc. in the United States District Court, Southern District of New York, seeking at least $1 billion in damages for alleged copyright infringement. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:11 am
Department of Justice has stated that the criminal division has started a far-reaching probe, and that they are “responding aggressively and taking it very seriously. [read post]
26 May 2009, 6:33 am
Obama Chooses Sotomayor for Supreme Court Nominee [The Caucus / New York Times] The Dynamic of the Nomination of Sonia Sotomayor [SCOTUSblog] Sonia Sotomayor [Wikipedia] On a Supreme Court Prospect's Résumé: 'Baseball Savior' [New York Times] Related: United States Supreme Court - Supreme Court - United States - Senate - Government [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 3:25 am
In New York, a third party, without privity, cannot maintain a claim against an attorney in professional negligence, "absent fraud, collusion, malicious acts or other special circumstances" (Spivey v Pulley, 138 AD2d 563, 564 [2d Dept 1988]). [read post]
