Search for: "State v. Long."
Results 9921 - 9940
of 51,510
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2012, 7:22 am
The case is State v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 3:15 am
In its analysis, the Court referenced a recent Texas Supreme Court decision, State Farm Lloyds v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 11:52 am
These two justices have long held the view that the Supreme Court's jurisdiction over state vs. state cases is mandatory, not discretionary. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 4:06 am
Ct. 280; United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 4:45 am
Sega; and No Doubt v. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 4:33 am
Plaintiffs failed to show that the NTP defendants actively projected themselves into New York to engage in a sustained and substantial transaction of business within New York, thereby purposefully availing themselves of the privilege of conducting activities in New York so as to subject them to long-arm jurisdiction pursuant to CPLR 302(a)(1) (see Paterno v Laser Spine Inst., 24 NY3d 370 [2014]; Bloomgarden v Lanza, 143 AD3d 850 [2d Dept. 2016]). [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 10:14 am
Arizona held July 25th in State v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 11:43 am
Maybe the state doesn't need to regulate what's in a local department's disciplinary files so long as they're open. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 1:20 pm
As explained by the Appeals Court, the appeal arises from a long-running conflict which has devolved to the present remaining dispute as to the classification of approximately 9,000 acre feet (AF) of water released between June 17 through 24 of 2004 from the Nimbus and New Melones reservoirs within California's Central Valley Project (the CVP or Project) by Defendant-Appellee United States Department of the Interior (Interior), acting through the United States… [read post]
13 May 2008, 7:34 am
In United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 1:00 am
The case, Whittington v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 1:23 pm
The TCPA also promoted the government’s interest in preventing citizens from being misled as to the originators of recorded phone messages, the court said.The May 25 decision is State of Maryland v. [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 11:10 am
In this (long) post, and in this article, Professor Jack Balkin proposes and fleshes out the argument that we should think in terms of two abortion rights, not one:The first right to abortion is a woman's right not to be forced by the state to bear children at risk to her life or health. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 1:33 am
In Connecticut v. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 2:38 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 9:09 am
It's a description of the power of the Guv under the state's constitution. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 4:43 am
Wisconsin v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:45 am
" In the recent Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals case Southern Pain & Anesthesia, et al v. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 12:30 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 11:23 pm
Under Marbury v. [read post]
