Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 9921 - 9940
of 16,404
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2013, 4:52 am
First, I read a provocative essay by Paul Butler, "Poor People Lose: Gideon and the Critique of Rights," in the Yale Law Journal's most recent issue, which contains over twenty articles (all available for free download) by law professors and lawyers reflecting on the 50th anniversary of Gideon v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:28 am
But Bosch v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 10:09 pm
Supreme Court and the Future of Human Rights Keitner on Human Rights Enforcement through Transnational Litigation New Alien Tort Statute Case At The United States Supreme Court: Kiobel, et al., v Royal Dutch Petroleum Petition Filed [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
In the first, Vance v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 11:28 am
” In Matisoff v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 7:09 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 8:38 pm
Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 12:01 pm
The fact that the landowner has a legal right to possession is a very strong factor in support of proportionality: it speaks for itself and needs no further explanation or justification. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 12:01 pm
The fact that the landowner has a legal right to possession is a very strong factor in support of proportionality: it speaks for itself and needs no further explanation or justification. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 5:04 pm
(Pix from Great Seal of the United States, State Symbols USA) For American Independence Day I started considering the essence of American ideology. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 8:38 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 6:35 am
In Robey v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1352-53 (Cal. 1996); Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass’n v. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 5:00 pm
In Robey v. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 10:55 am
In relying on Roper v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 9:52 am
Gideon v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 9:06 am
Roughly two and a half months later the United States Supreme Court in Association for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 7:13 am
Earlier this week, the Supreme Court's decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 7:13 am
Earlier this week, the Supreme Court's decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 6:45 am
Under these circumstances, the law allows for a strong inference that discrimination was not a determining factor in the adverse action. [read post]
