Search for: "United States v. John"
Results 9921 - 9940
of 11,601
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2010, 2:30 pm
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ———————————–x BELLMER DOLLS, a Partnership, PETER MAVROGEORGIS, ANTHONY MALAT, and PETER SHEERIN, Plaintiffs, - v - : ASIM SHAIKH aka ASIM GRABOWSKI-SHAIKH, HUNGRY EYE RECORDS LLC, PUBCO, DANIEL SKIBRA, and : JOHN DOES 1-5, Defendants. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 11:14 am
In other news relating to Citizens United, Jeff Rosen suggests in The New Republic that the decision was “precisely the kind of divisive and unnecessarily sweeping opinion that Chief Justice John Roberts had once pledged to avoid. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 10:47 am
Oklahoma City University’s Michael O’Shea explains the history and multiple meanings of United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 6:39 am
”) At the Volokh Conspiracy, John Elwood writes about a petition that has been relisted twice, Harrington v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 3:51 am
Johns v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 1:06 pm
Co. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 6:30 am
John Elwood at the Volokh Conspiracy discusses Thaler v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 5:43 am
Const., art I, § 3, cl. 1 (“The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State . . . [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm
United States Docket: 09-342 Issues: (1) What constitutes the proper denominator in the takings fraction under Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 7:22 am
At Cato@Liberty, John Samples discusses the bill recently introduced by Senator Charles Schumer and Representative Chris Van Hollen in response to the Court’s decision in Citizens United. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 6:06 am
He simply stated that he did not believe the panel fully understood the facts of Ms. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 6:02 am
The Michigan Court of Appeals ruled in a 2004 published case (People v Adams) that a defendant cannot assert a defense at trial of his or her, "inability to pay" the court-ordered child support.Accordingly, in the Likine case, the Attorney General requested trial judge John McDonald to preclude Likine from introducing any of the above facts regarding her disability and resulting lack of income from jury consideration. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 5:45 am
The Michigan Court of Appeals ruled in a 2004 published case (People v Adams) that a defendant cannot assert a defense at trial of his or her, "inability to pay" the court-ordered child support.Accordingly, in the Likine case, the Attorney General requested trial judge John McDonald to preclude Likine from introducing any of the above facts regarding her disability and resulting lack of income from jury consideration. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 8:00 am
In a January 27th, 2010, opinion, the Oregon Court of Appeals decided:Tim Tubra v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 6:06 am
The United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida dismissed the amended complaint. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 6:00 am
Dec. 22, 2009), the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit applied the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Tellabs, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 8:41 am
Nixon, United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 8:47 pm
Now consider the Fifth Circuit’s decision yesterday in United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 6:21 pm
Kurz v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 7:27 am
United States. [read post]
