Search for: "Weeks v. United States" Results 9921 - 9940 of 19,108
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2021, 11:30 am by Pamela Foohey
The Attorney General of the United States cited the RFI as a reason that the Supreme Court should reject a writ of certiorari in McCoy v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 10:43 am by Vivian Persand
This week, I write about a case where a court agreed that the carrier breached the contract, but not in bad faith.In Stevenson v. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 7:18 am by Kevin Smith, J.D.
  Last week we learned that the United States government has asked for extra time to decide if it will intervene, and it has made clear that its intervention would either support the publishers or favor neither party. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 8:51 am by Gary A. Watt
  The case involved the unsettled state of the federal pleading requirements since the United States Supreme Court decided Twombly and Iqbal. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:04 pm by cdw
” [via LexisOne] FAVORABLE TO THE PROSECUTION OR EXECUTIONER United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 9:51 am by Steven Boutwell
Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor et al, No. 15-60148 (5th Cir. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 4:07 pm
" and here is the abstract:On June 25, 2008, the United States Supreme Court issued an opinion in Kennedy v. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 1:01 pm
The vote came after a series of speeches during which the majority of countries called on Russia to end the violence in Ukraine, which has continued for nearly one week. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 5:00 am by Pranay Vaddi
The last treaty that limits the United States’s and Russia’s nuclear weapons, the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (New START), will expire in February 2021 unless both states agree to its extension. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 11:46 pm by Orin Kerr
The police arrested Bowen two weeks later at a hotel, where he was discovered hiding under a bed. [read post]
” Rutherford Institute: A leading advocate of civil liberties and human rights in the United States for more than 30 years, the Rutherford Institute argues that the bulk phone-records program amounts to nothing more than a “modern-day general warrant” — precisely the kind of unrestrained government search with which the Founders were most concerned when drafting the Fourth Amendment. [read post]