Search for: "DEFENDER SECURITY COMPANY" Results 9941 - 9960 of 17,855
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2015, 1:16 pm by Joel O'Malley
Certain actions, regardless of potential damages, are considered material, including (a) bankruptcy, receivership, and similar proceedings; and (b) proceedings to which any director, officer, or affiliate of the company, or any owner of more than 5% of any class of voting securities of the company, or any of their associates, is an adverse party or has a material adverse interest. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 7:57 am by Michael Markarian
It is urgently needed, as some companies have been poised to open horse slaughter plants in the United States. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 3:44 am by Broc Romanek
In addition to ordering disgorgement and civil penalties, they just order defendants to do what the securities laws already require them to do – that is, obey the law. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:30 pm by Anna Baldwin
Yet that is where I part company. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 11:12 am
“I find that the required investment in CEVA Investments was intended to create the impression in the mind of the plaintiff that by accepting employment with the defendant he would have a degree of job security beyond what would normally be anticipated. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 8:51 am
  Defendants operate a number of Texas companies in the skin care market, all of which distribute skin care products containing “NeriumAD,” an extract of the nerium oleander plant. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 8:05 am by Allison Tussey
According to his plea and court documents, Udeze was a licensed mortgage broker who worked at various companies, including Newgate Mortgage, owned by co-defendant Shola Risikat Balogun, and EWA Mortgage. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 1:02 pm by John O'Sullivan
The defendant was a substantial company to whom trial, the judge found, “is a matter of course”. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 4:22 am by Kevin LaCroix
Bear Stearns sought to have the carriers in the program indemnify the company for the $160 million amount in the settlement labeled as “disgorgement. [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 2:45 pm
JF testified that he was not given any ties, slings, chokers, fasteners or similar devices to secure the pipes. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 3:01 pm by Inside Privacy
§ 1956 to “enabl[e] appropriate charges for defendants who engage in money laundering to conceal profits from the sale of surreptitious interception devices. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 1:58 pm by Katitza Rodriguez and Nadia Kayyali
Companies and groups such as Riseup want to provide users with reliable, secure network services even when—in fact especially when—dealing with requests from law enforcement and lawyers to hand over private user information and logs. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 5:15 am by Robin Shea
The company is going to trial because it listed the plaintiff by name on the disclosures that it was required to file by the Securities and Exchange Commission. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 3:25 pm by Lyle Roberts
Plaintiffs often contend that if the disclosure required under Item 303 involves material information, then a company’s failure to disclose that information constitutes a material omission for purposes of securities fraud liability. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 1:16 pm by Robin Frazer Clark
  In a lawsuit, a defendant may claim some other person or company is to blame also and may ask the jury to consider assessing some percentage of fault or blame to that other person or company who is not named as a defendant in the lawsuit. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 12:53 pm
The defendants were seeking records from his cardiologist and primary care physician. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:00 am by Jason M. Knott
  Typically, they allege that the defendants did not properly manage the company’s cyber risks. [read post]