Search for: "EXPENSE OF JUDGES" Results 9941 - 9960 of 24,979
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2016, 1:44 pm by Ron Coleman
What’s the worst thing that can happen to a well-heeled plaintiff that wants to use the expense of defending, even meritoriously, against a “federal case” as a way to effectuate a “business message” (namely, you’re out of business, because we say so)? [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 1:22 pm by Christie D. Arkovich, P.A.
 Mandatory arbitration clauses force a consumer to give up their right to go to court, participate in a class action, pay expensive filing fees of sometimes thousands of dollars, pay an arbitrator $300-$400 a hour (a Judge is free!) [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 1:09 pm
These statistics can target certain PTAB judges or technology centers, allowing litigants to better estimate their likelihood of success.PTAB judges have been granting requests to institute IPR petitions more often than not, with petitions being instituted in whole or in part 72% of the time. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 1:05 pm by The Murray Law Firm
“You pretty much have to judge character,” Johnson says. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 6:37 am by Susan Hennessey
Reasonable minds differ only on how to accomplish one without doing so at the expense of the other. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 4:58 am by Mary Zambreno
  Currently, as the statute above reads, judges are required to consider such factors but it is in their individual discretion as to how much weight to apply to each individual relevant factor. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 2:30 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
A consumer who had an account closed and goes to open a new account at another institution may be equally unaware of how this screening information will be used to judge his or her account application. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 1:15 pm
Norges Bank has decided to place Petroleo Brasileiro SA (Petrobras) under observation because of the risk of severe corruption. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 10:10 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
District Court Judge Harvey Bartle III ordered Fattah Jr. to pay $1,172,157 in restitution. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 3:00 am by The Law Offices Of Peter Van Aulen
The goal of the program is to allow the parties to reach a settlement on the issues in dispute early on in the divorce process to avoid the lengthy and expensive litigation process. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 3:00 am by The Law Offices Of Peter Van Aulen
The goal of the program is to allow the parties to reach a settlement on the issues in dispute early on in the divorce process to avoid the lengthy and expensive litigation process. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 5:47 pm by Law Lady
Dissolution of marriage -- Equitable distribution -- Trial court exceeded scope of appellate mandate by revaluing assets and liabilities, including revisiting issue of value of former husband's dental practice, and by reducing duration of alimony award -- Trial court did not exceed scope of remand by considering evidence regarding former husband's current income, which was relevant to amount of alimony and issue of whether husband could be compelled to pay for minor child's private… [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
  This issue was addressed in a recent decision by Lycoming County Court of Common Pleas Judge Richard A. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 1:31 pm by Lee E. Berlik
The new amendment to Rule 26 places the concept of proportionality front and center, but the concept has lingered in the back of judges’ minds since at least 1983, when Rule 26(b)(1) was first amended to guard against “disproportionate discovery. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 1:31 pm by Lee E. Berlik
The new amendment to Rule 26 places the concept of proportionality front and center, but the concept has lingered in the back of judges’ minds since at least 1983, when Rule 26(b)(1) was first amended to guard against “disproportionate discovery. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 7:36 am by Daniel Shaviro
 The issues of ultimate importance really turn on the consequences of alternative rule designs, as judged based on some underlying set of metrics. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
The judge assessed the Appellant’s entitlement to be paid for extra work in accordance with the principle of contractual quantum meruit, allowing claims for expenses and extra materials in the net amount of $126,371.51. [read post]
30 Jan 2016, 9:04 am by Associates and Bruce L. Scheiner
Even though it is against the law to drive without baseline coverage, some drivers take a chance because insurance is too expensive. [read post]