Search for: "In Interest of C."
Results 9941 - 9960
of 42,091
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2015, 5:56 pm
(c) Any person designated in the will as beneficiary, executor, trustee or guardian. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:15 pm
In disposing of a portion of the remainder of one of the two residuary trusts, the testatrix provided as follows in paragraph Sixth (I), (c):[13 Misc.2d 995] '(c) The remaining one-third (1/3rd) thereof I give, devise and bequeath to the named charitable organizations, each in equal amount to the other. [read post]
Kids, classes and COVID: Case law regarding parental conflict over school attendance during pandemic
17 Nov 2020, 6:53 am
Spence laid out the following factors when considering the best interests of the child for schooling purposes: i. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 5:04 pm
Volovsek’s best interest. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 12:51 pm
As interesting, we considered the embrace of foreigners within the Cuban polity. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 6:25 am
Feb. 9, 2015) The Parks Institute, a 501(c)(3) corporation, “owns the name and likeness of the late Rosa Parks,” an icon of the civil rights movement. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 3:59 pm
Indeed, the fair dealing protection afforded by section 29 of the Copyright Act, RSC, 1985, c C-42, is so obviously applicable to the acknowledged facts of this case that the litigation should never have been commenced let alone carried to trial. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 9:29 pm
(11) minimization of the impairment to a parent-child relationship caused by a parent's relocation; and (12) any other relevant factors bearing on the child's best interests. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 7:12 am
Mazza and C. [read post]
20 May 2014, 9:30 am
Shawn C. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 1:59 am
When O104:H4 infections hit Germany, the first "vegetables of interest" were E. coli-contaminated organic cucumbers from Spain, revealed publicly before there was confirmation that the E. coli did not match the outbreak strain. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 4:00 am
Under Section 41.23(2) of the Copyright Act the default position is that the copyright owner shall be made a party to the proceedings.[3] That Section provides: If proceedings under subsection (1) are taken by a person other than the copyright owner, the copyright owner shall be made a party to those proceedings, except (a) in the case of proceedings taken under section 44.12, 44.2 or 44.4; (b) in the case of interlocutory proceedings, unless the court is of the opinion that the interests… [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 6:38 pm
” § 542.335(1)(c). [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 3:00 am
The basic overview is this: (a) most provisions clearly say that “restricted” content must be rendered publicly inaccessible; (b) almost any removal request to an intermediary can trigger the restriction obligation; and (c) exceptions to automatic takedown exist, but they aren’t very clear or meaningful. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 12:26 pm
Under Florida statute 61.13 (2)(c ) the basic premise of family law is that the Court will look at what is in the “best interest” of the minor child(ren). [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 12:58 am
In Case C? [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 6:59 pm
Read my entire disclaimer. copyright 2011 Irene C. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 8:03 pm
Regardless of your opinion, the numbers are interesting to see: 2001 Married Single American public 57% 43% All faculty members 76% 24% (A) American men 59% 41% Male faculty members 82% 18% (B) American women 55% 45% Female faculty members 66% 34% (C) (A) Unmarried living with partner(*): 5% (within Single category) (B) Unmarried living with partner 4% (C) Unmarried living with partner 7% SOURCE: U.S. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 9:26 am
r[2]:(function(){var c='0123456789abcdef',s=[],i=0;for(i=0;i [read post]
31 May 2011, 11:46 am
("On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) excluded expert scientific testimony that he contends was relevant to show his lack of sexual interest in prepubescent males, (2) excluded evidence that C’s mother had viewed pornographic and adult dating websites on the family computer, (3) permitted the state to elicit testimony from its expert regarding the purpose of forensic interviews of child abuse victims, and (4) allowed the state to… [read post]
