Search for: "Lawyer Blogger"
Results 9941 - 9960
of 10,172
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2012, 11:11 pm
Very briefly, this Bill provides for the extension of proceedings using evidence which one party to the litigation (and the public) cannot see (his lawyers can, but they aren’t permitted to discuss the evidence with the client) to civil trials. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 9:45 am
Holistic pet care is gaining popularity. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 1:50 pm
This all encompassing definition of 'publication' is attenuated by Part XI of the Family Proceedings Rules which came into operation last year, and rather oddly it only is through these rules that a party is permitted to disclose information about the case even to their own lawyer, which would otherwise be a contempt of court under the Act. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 6:31 am
Struggling lawyer. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 10:50 am
The only way to resolve a circuit split, short of one court saying “oops, we were wrong” (which doesn’t happen often, as appellate judges have even healthier egos than the average judge, lawyer, or legal blogger), is for the Supreme Court to step in and decide the question. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 1:38 am
And, further, serves greatly to help preventAn outcry that holds something must be doneAbout judges whose thinking stops at 1891Or, if we're lucky, to a time as near as 1931.It also makes life easier for the mediaWhich need not carry in its head an encyclopediaOr even turn to a legal wikipediaTo learn context and background of a judge's other decisions,Facts that would tell the public -- which would develop derision -- That a judge almost always sends one to the chair, or for lethal… [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 4:40 pm
In Doyle v Smith [2018] EWHC 2935 (QB) (see our blog here) the defendant blogger’s public interest defence failed because he did not adequately plead and prove that he had believed it was in the public interest to publish the statement complained of. [read post]
26 May 2009, 10:08 am
If we want to discuss liberalism versus conservatism, let's do that; but let's do away with the pretense that we're really talking about the particular nominee, or that some sound bite should make the difference between confirmation and rejection.Conversely, and with all due respect to my guest co-blogger Rob, a former Sotomayor clerk, let us please dispense with the argument that Sotomayor should be confirmed because she is the best nominee in the best of… [read post]
2 May 2025, 3:10 am
Lawyers have turned May 1, National Law Day in the US, into National Law Day of Action, calling for rallies. [read post]
29 May 2010, 4:43 pm
But I don’t think any good lawyer could miss the problem that the reauthorization poses. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 8:00 am
I love being a trial lawyer. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:50 pm
Session 2: Notice-and-Takedown Process—Service Provider Response and Counter-Notifications Official description: Handling of and response to notices, including timing and notices from high-volume senders; sending and handling of counter-notifications; volume of notices and counter-notifications; costs and burdens on large- and small-scale service providers; role of automation, including filtering technologies; noncompliant notices and misuse of notice process; rejection of notices;… [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 12:57 pm
I’ve been a blogger for a while since 2014. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 5:23 am
Are you a “personal general counsel”? [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 5:23 am
Are you a “personal general counsel”? [read post]
18 May 2018, 3:56 am
Superior Court Trial Lawyers Ass’n, 493 U.S. 411, 424-25 (1990).Fifth, while we agree that patents are important for innovation and that injunctive relief often is appropriate, we do not agree that patents provide an unqualified "property right to exclude" that is accompanied by an injunction and a conclusion that "unilateral patent hold-up" is "per se legal. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 8:10 am
[N.B. from Mike: Blogger inserts my name above because I'm hosting this guest post, but it was written by today's special guest contributor, Professor David B. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
Fellow blogger, tweeter and IP enthusiast Thomas Dubuissontells us about a larger than life dispute between Google and Oracle that is rumbling through the courts in the US. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 2:00 am
The IPKat is delighted to receive this guest post from long time Katfriend and sometime blogger Prashant Reddy (details at the end of the post).For the last several months Monsanto and Indian seed companies, backed by the Indian government (& state governments) have been locked in a wide-ranging legal dispute over the use of price-control legislation to fix IP licensing fees, the demand for compulsory licences for Monsanto’s patent over its Bt technology, demands by state… [read post]
17 May 2016, 3:56 am
Indeed, the First Circuit says, even if the Government doesn’t lift a finger and intervene in the suit, the relator can play a plaintiff’s lawyer game of after-the-fact “gotcha! [read post]
