Search for: "No Named Defendant" Results 9941 - 9960 of 57,362
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2013, 11:06 am
This Kat wouldn't have known about it, were it not for the kindness of Nikki Powell (Head of Litigation, Haseltine Lake LLP, who acted for the defendant). [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 12:20 pm
If I may put it technically, a person appearing as both a plaintiff and a defendant is a pretty big no no. [read post]
10 Jun 2007, 10:00 am
Even the Second Circuit would have to conclude that these names are "similar. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 11:10 am
The use of the word "'all,' in and of itself, does not render a warrant a general warrant," particularly, as here, the warrant "reasonably sought all documents with other people's names. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 12:19 pm
However, Learned Hand also applied an extensive analysis of the effects a monopoly on the shape and name of "Shredded Wheat" would have on competition in the cereal industry. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 3:55 pm by royblack
At the time the name meant nothing to me. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 3:01 pm by Eugene Volokh
§ 1983, alleging that Defendants, Adult Corrections Officer Bartolotti, Maui Community Correctional Center ("MCCC"), and unidentified MCCC "agents" violated the Eighth Amendment…. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 10:04 pm by Dan Flynn
The judge acknowledges he has missed the 90-day deadline for reaching a restitution order after sentencing, but says he maintains jurisdiction because he “had concluded that restitution was mandatory as to each of the above named Defendants and that the only outstanding issues is the amount of restitution. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 2:05 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Complainants named in the indictment were Intervenor and the Mortgage Corporation, Plaintiff's predecessor in interest. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 5:15 pm by Stephen Bilkis
They assert, nonetheless, that their announcement of readiness was timely for two reasons, namely: (1) that the defendant's pre-conversion oral request for a copy of the search warrant underlying the defendant's arrest, is an excludable pre-trial delay as provided in CPL 30.30[4][a] ; and (2), even if the Court would disallow the request for a copy of the search warrant as an excludable pre-trial delay, as the day on which the People would have been required to announce… [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 8:02 am
In both of these other declaratory judgments, the courts found that even if the plaintiff did violate defendants' publicity rights, the plaintiff enjoyed a First Amendment right to use the publicly available players' names and statistics that prevailed over any right of publicity. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 8:38 am by Moseley Collins
(Please note: the names and locations of all parties have been changed to protect the confidentiality of the participants in this car accident/personal injury case and its proceedings.) [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 8:01 am by Moseley Collins
(Please note: the names and locations of all parties have been changed to protect the confidentiality of the participants in this personal injury case and its proceedings.) [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 8:51 am by Moseley Collins
(Please also note: the names and locations of all parties have been changed to protect the confidentiality of the participants in this medical malpractice case and its proceedings.) [read post]
9 May 2010, 8:42 am by Moseley Collins
That [defendant] intentionally or carelessly created the impression that [agent] was [defendant]'s [employee/agent]; 2. [read post]
2 May 2016, 5:10 pm by John C. Manoog III
These statutes are often referred to as “dram shop” acts (so named because spirits were once sold by a measurement known as a “dram”). [read post]