Search for: "People v. House" Results 9941 - 9960 of 12,708
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
Section 3 of the Representation of the People Act 1983 remains unamended by the rulings in  Hirst v United Kingdom (No 2) (2006) 42 EHRR 849 and Greens and MT v United Kingdom (23 November 2010) that it offends against Article 3 Protocol 1 by imposing a blanket ban on prisoners from participating in elections. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 2:11 pm by NL
Akhtar v Birmingham City Council [2011] EWCA Civ 383 [not on bailii yet, we've seen a transcript] When a Local Authority accepts the applicant’s case on a review under s.202 review under Housing Act 1996, is there or should there be a duty to give reasons why the applicant was successful and on what objections they were not successful? [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:13 am by Roshonda Scipio
HousingHD7288.72.U5 B46 2010Tierra y libertad : land, liberty, and Latino housing / Steven W. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 9:20 am by CJLF Staff
  Though this practice has been very common during jury selection, in its 1995 ruling, State v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:19 am by Marie Louise
(Inovia) (Inventive Step) (IP Spotlight) (Patently-O) (Patent Law Practice Center) House debates patent reform – H. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 3:48 pm
I expect Student Loans to be the scourge of this Generation; I routinely talk to wonderful people who have gigantic student loans, and have no chance of getting them paid any time during this depression. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 5:10 am by INFORRM
Further, section 1 of the Defamation Act 1996 provides a defence of innocent dissemination to people who are not the author, editor or commercial publisher of a defamatory statement. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
  Still, a court could find that it was reasonable for the officers to place Derrick in the cruiser, rather than have a robbery suspect standing there while people from the neighborhood are milling around. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 1:17 am by Adam Wagner
He goes on to discuss the now infamous hunting ban case, R (Jackson) v Her Majesty’s Attorney-General. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:26 pm by WIMS
EPW Hearing State & Local Perspectives On Transportation Morrison Enterprises  v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 11:44 am by Steve Hall
Supreme Court case referenced in the Observer editorial is that of McCleskey v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
He said that if you consider California as a house, California law can punish the conduct of the homeowner who is throwing rocks into other states and hurting people in those other states because the conduct took place in California. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 8:09 am by admin
Fletcher is a well-known investor –   So was Bernie – and even people who are honest can get way overextended. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 6:50 am by gstasiewicz
The people of Arizona are the winners today along with the Arizona State Legislature, Arizona State Senate President Russell Pearce, and Arizona House Speaker Kirk Adams,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. [read post]