Search for: "Petite v. United States"
Results 9941 - 9960
of 13,108
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2010, 12:34 pm
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Respondent Petition for Review of an Order of the Environmental Protection Administration Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 1:14 pm
The Supreme Court’s June decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 1:14 pm
The Supreme Court’s June decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 11:28 pm
he United States Department of Agriculture ("USDA") justifies the Plant Protection Act ("PPA")(7 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 5:21 pm
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2010/12/21/05-15916.pdf United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 3:00 am
Jain v. [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 9:39 pm
: General Motors LLC v. [read post]
25 Dec 2010, 4:41 am
And the case of United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 11:21 am
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/281418.opn.doc.pdf Federal Law Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals: United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 5:46 am
The petition of the day is: Title: Judulang v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 8:30 pm
Earle Partington was the civilian defense counsel in both the trial and appeal of the case of United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 12:05 pm
” United Servs. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 5:33 am
That’s why we’re fighting to vacate our client’s plea under a court decision called State v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
With distressing frequency, especially in capital cases such as this, federal judges refuse to be governed by Congress’s command that state criminal judgments must not be revised by federal courts unless they are “contrary to, or involv[e] an unreasonable application of, clearly estab- lished Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States,” 28 U. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 6:02 am
On December 3, 2010, the acting United States Solicitor General filed the long-awaited amicus curiae brief of the United States in the case of Maxwell-Jolly v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 3:24 pm
Wuterich v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 3:01 am
Toomey, citing School District 6 v NYSHRB, 35 NY2d 371, said that such a personnel policy, even if the product of negotiations under [the Taylor Law] would violate the State’s Human Rights Law and is therefore a prohibited subject of negotiations.* See Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436 [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 3:07 pm
The cert petition in Mullins v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 5:39 pm
See e.g., United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 5:52 pm
[Eric's note: Venkat and I soon will blog the MDY v. [read post]
