Search for: "State v. Favors"
Results 9941 - 9960
of 37,603
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2020, 8:32 am
Kulch v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 7:01 am
Co. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 2:51 pm
In United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:17 am
A state’s highest court generally gets to have the last word on insurance policy interpretation. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 5:30 am
Is King v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 2:32 pm
The state sent back to Congress ten Republicans and three Democrats, just as they had in 2014, and by all measures of partisan impact, the 2011 plan is only slightly more favorable to Republicans than the 2016 plan. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
A “Class of One” is not available to an individual in litigation involving a public employer Appel v Spiridon et al, 531 F.3d 138* A faculty member employed by Western Connecticut State University [WCSU] was told that she would be required to submit to a medical examination involuntarily as a condition of her being continued in her employment with the University. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 6:42 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Administrative Appeals Opinions Body: Rainforest Cafe, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:51 pm
The first case to come to many minds probably is the landmark 1973 ruling of Roe v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 2:40 pm
She stated that she wanted to settle the case. [read post]
22 May 2024, 6:00 am
In considering a motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) to dismiss a complaint for failure to state a cause of action, the court must afford the pleading a liberal construction, accept the facts as alleged in the pleading as true, accord the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference, and determine only whether the facts as alleged fit within any cognizable legal theory (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87; Bumpus v New York City Tr. [read post]
22 May 2024, 6:00 am
In considering a motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) to dismiss a complaint for failure to state a cause of action, the court must afford the pleading a liberal construction, accept the facts as alleged in the pleading as true, accord the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference, and determine only whether the facts as alleged fit within any cognizable legal theory (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87; Bumpus v New York City Tr. [read post]
27 Jul 2019, 5:26 pm
In East of Eden Cannabis Co. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 4:56 am
Zaleppa v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 10:25 am
Case Name: Conine v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 9:37 am
Here is the text of Arizona Governor Jan Brewer’s October 13, 2010, press release about the brief she filed on behalf of Arizona in the United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 8:07 am
Vidal v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 1:29 pm
However, under United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 2:41 pm
This political cartoon was drawn in 1812 in reaction to the state senate election district of South Essex created by the Massachusetts legislature to favor the candidates of Governor Elbridge Gerry over the Federalists. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
Law Lessons from STATE V. [read post]
