Search for: "State v. Michael A." Results 9941 - 9960 of 13,680
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2011, 6:52 am by INFORRM
Nevertheless, the newspaper repeated the defamation: in an article alongside a photograph of Watters the newspaper had stated: We may have to apologise to this revolting pervert but will we mean it? [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 9:27 am by Stefanie Levine
Michael Davitz, Partner at Axinn, Veltrop & Harkrider and  Practice Center Contributor, recently sent in this article he wrote with colleague’s Drew Schulte and Jia Li discussing the Patent Prosecution Highway and the value that can be achieved for those practitioners willing to explore the new program. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 6:27 am by Ted Frank
In another post, I'll explain where I agree and disagree with Michael Krauss and Robert Levy's 2004 analysis of the question. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm by Graeme Hall
See today’s In the courts Luton Borough Council & Nottingham City Council & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Education [2011] EWHC 217 (Admin) (11 February 2011): Coalition cancellation of school-building program was unlawful. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 8:58 am by Guest Blogger
Michael GreveA pending cert petition in S&M Brands v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 2:02 am by Frank [eLL Editor-in-Chief]
That is exactly what the court ordered a company to do in Jannx Medical Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 9:00 am by Lawrence Solum
The Download of the Week is Reforming Article V: The Problems Created by the National Convention Amendment Method and How to Fix Them by Michael B. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 3:27 am by Adam Wagner
Luton Borough Council & Nottingham City Council & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Education [2011] EWHC 217 (Admin) (11 February 2011) – Read judgment The high court has ruled that the coalition government’s cancellation of Labour’s school building program in 6 areas was unlawful. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 12:56 pm by Jessie Canon
A unanimous Supreme Court overruled longstanding precedent established in Betts v. [read post]