Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 9941 - 9960 of 10,388
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2024, 8:39 am by centerforartlaw
Until 2016, different jurisdictions in the United States had different rules regarding art confiscated due to Nazi persecution. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 2:55 pm
S. 989 (1982), approved in NLRB v. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 8:01 am by Mikk Putk
However, a key benefit of the close collaboration is the involvement of researchers and experts from a whole variety of business units and technology groups. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:41 am by Norman L. Eisen
Expand all Collapse all Relevant Court Proceedings United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
“This settlement marks a crucial step toward combating ocean acidification with our nation’s strongest water-quality law, the Clean Water Act,” said Miyoko Sakashita, oceans director at the Center. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 4:00 am by Devlin Hartline
The same Google that forfeited $500 million to the United States government after it got caught assisting foreign pharmacies in importing illegal drugs thinks it’s OK to assist foreign rogue sites in the commission of online piracy. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 11:46 am by Anushka Limaye
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 1:59 am
 Um, last year alone we took about 200 enforcement actions, uh, in plants in the United States. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The Court had held in 1909 that people who were employed by or received pensions from the United States couldn’t serve as jurors in federal criminal cases. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Consider the reforms of Solon and then of Cleisthenes in Athens, the outcome of the Social War in Rome, and of course the Reconstruction Amendments, the expansion of the franchise to women, and similar moments in the United States. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 5:31 am
(For contemporary illustrations of this point, see the interpretation recently promulgated by Bishop Mark Lawrence, or the statement of Bishop Shaw on gay marriage in his diocese, or the court's decision in the Dixon v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 11:06 pm by Jeff Gamso
 And yet I took the job.And swore the oath set forth in 28 USC § 453.Each justice or judge of the United States shall take the following oath or affirmation before performing the duties of his office: “I, XXX XXX, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as XXX under the… [read post]