Search for: "AMP, INC. v. United States" Results 9961 - 9980 of 11,017
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2008, 4:30 am
See, e.g., Pioneer Healthcare, Inc., 75 F.3d 75, 80 (1st Cir. 1996); CAE, Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 10:49 am
"Three almost identical actions have since been filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making… [read post]
2 May 2008, 1:03 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice
 Prison Term Is Reduced Due to Retroactive Application of Guideline Amendments
 United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 5:50 am
Win.In Patti &;amp; Johnny's, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 5:01 pm
  The United State Supreme Court recently held in LaRue v. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 11:42 am
Clearly there is magic in the name, and Fame Jeans tried to capture that magic by registering Jack &;amp; Jones as a trademark in the United States. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 9:54 am
  On the merits, the Federal Circuit rejected the contention that because legal title to the products changed in Canada that there was not a &;quot;sale" in the United States as contemplated by § 271(a), given that the customer was in the United States and the products were shipped there. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 12:00 pm
Lee, a director since 1994, is also a director of United States Steel Corporation, Marathon Oil Corporation, The Procter &;amp; Gamble Company and The DIRECTV Group, Inc. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US:… [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 10:27 am
United States Fish &;amp; Wildlife Service, 378 F.3d 1059 (9th Cir. 2004), we conclude that the jeopardy regulation requires NMFS to consider both recovery and survival impacts... [read post]