Search for: "B&B LLC"
Results 9961 - 9980
of 12,242
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2024, 7:41 am
§507(b). [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:28 pm
§ 9307(b)(1). [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (Spicy IP),USD 20 billion going off-patent: (Patent Circle),Canadian Prices Review Board asserts jurisdiction over products sold in US, but imported into Canada under Special Access Program: (Gowlings),Canadian Court of Appeal affirms decision allowing patent-owner to be joined to proceedings: Cobalt v Pfizer and Pharmascience v Pfizer: (Gowlings),PharmaStem appeals stem cell patent: asks for greater deference to patent examiners: PharmaStem … [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 4:17 pm
ACE FUNDING SOURCE, LLC, Appellant, v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 1:55 am
Options A, B, and C would use sales tax base broadening and/or rate increases to offset the additional cost of income tax reductions above $1.2 billion, while Options D and E would each provide a sustainable net tax cut of approximately $1.2 billion without sales tax base broadening or rate increases, meaning the income tax cuts in Options D and E a [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 9:23 pm
Corp.; complaint alleged violation of Section 8(b)(3). [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 2:17 pm
Clocktower Law LLC (Clocktower) conducts conflict-of-interest checks for each new client. b. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 11:02 am
Chamber of Commerce in support of respondentAmicus brief of Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America in support of respondent (forthcoming)Brief for respondent RadLAX Gateway Hotel, LLC v. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 6:07 pm
” The case is Matthew B. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 9:13 am
Guidance may be on the horizon on constitutionality and/or standing issues under the False Marking Statute, in FLFMC, LLC v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 7:55 am
., LLC, B-408777 (2013), GAO upheld the agency’s decision to reject a proposal as late where the offeror submitted the proposal via email, but accidentally left off the price proposal as an attachment. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 2:41 pm
CCPA Initial Action and Initial Post-Pandemic Action: Zooming to the Courthouse Though many of the early cases filed have used the CCPA as a placeholder to be bootstrapped with B&P 17200 and tort claims[2], the right to bring a private action was quickly availed with the first suit brought on February 3 against an e-commerce platform and the operator of the platform.[3] Interestingly, the alleged security breaches in this case were before the January 1, 2020, triggering date, but… [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 9:15 am
HesseDocket: 10-157Issue(s): (1) Whether a federal court may review a state court judgment approving a class settlement where the state court did not explicitly address each specific claim that a class member might release as part of the settlement; and (2) whether a federal court may nullify state court rules, requiring class members to opt out of a proposed state class settlement, by permitting the class members to maintain a subsequent federal action asserting claims released by the state class… [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 10:33 am
Unfortunately, the grant in this case means that nerd-heartthrob Kent Recycling Services, LLC v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 12:12 pm
§ 553(b)(3)(B), (d)(3). [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 4:30 am
During a child custody case, District Judge B. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 10:41 am
Section 2244(b)(1) of Title 28 creates a rule covering applications by state prisoners for habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:40 am
§ 1395ww(b)(3)(A)(ii) and the agency’s implementing regulation; and (2) whether the Court should revisit the rule articulated in Auer v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 3:00 am
(GRAY on Claims) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Blocking attorneys from simultaneously litigating and prosecuting patents: In re Deutsche Bank Trust (Patently-O) CAFC: Muscle ad in magazine invalidates patent: Iovate Health Science Inc v Bio-Engineered Supplements & Nutrition Inc (IPKat) (IP Directions) CAFC: If patent troll sends the letter, then a case-or-controversy ‘implicitly’ is asserted: HP v Acceleron (ISinIP) District Court S D Florida denies summary judgment… [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 11:12 pm
Plaintiffs were owners of Class A stock of JQH, which was publicly traded (as opposed to Class B stock). [read post]
