Search for: "Does 1 - 29"
Results 9961 - 9980
of 13,860
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2012, 2:41 pm
Continuing debate surrounds the following riddles: 1) is it the impact of the project on the environment or the environment on the project (South Orange County Wastewater Authority v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 3:38 am
The judge continued with the trial nonetheless, ultimately granting a Rule 29. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 1:35 pm
MATS or "Utility MACT) [See WIMS 11/29/11], the first national standards to protect American families from power plant emissions of mercury and toxic air pollution like arsenic, acid gas, nickel, selenium, and cyanide. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 11:15 am
The Lesson for 2012: An organization does not have to suffer the same fate as the company in the Northington case. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 10:32 am
" The SEC argued that the Second Circuit does have jurisdiction under Carson v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 10:20 am
That’s the pre-emption clause of ERISA, 29 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 8:16 am
On December 29, 2011, the Michigan Court of Appeals issued its opinion in People v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 3:10 am
H.R. 1249 was signed by President Obama on Sept. 16, 2011 and became Public Law No. 112-29. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 9:08 pm
The court further noted that “[t]he fact that the officers may have believed Martinez was carrying illegal drugs does not invalidate an otherwise valid stop. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 7:49 pm
Ohio Nov. 29, 2011). [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 11:15 am
It now hangs in the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York City, as does After Walker Evans 2. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 12:39 am
But Article 125 covered (and still does) another offense, as well: bestiality. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 9:20 pm
Our cases hold that such a brief detention for a dog sniff at the end of a traffic stop is de minimis and does not violate the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm
The new provisions are to be applied to factual situations that were not yet completed at that time, provided that they are mentioned in Article 1, n° 1, first and second sentences of the Decision of the Administrative Council of 28 June 2001 on the transitional provisions under Article 7 of the Act revising the EPC of 29 November 2000 (OJ EPO, Special edition 1/2007, 197). [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 8:19 am
The Milwaukee Braves, soon to be reported as 144 N.W.2d 1 (1966). [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 8:00 am
Nature does not sink a ship merely because of its size, and neither do courts overrule a board's decision to approve and later honor a severance package, merely because of its size. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 9:20 pm
In other words, the policy does not specify which persons an officer must search—for instance, by requiring that every person’s closed containers be searched—nor does the policy specify how intrusive any given search may be—for instance, by requiring that closed containers be examined only by x-ray as opposed to a visual search. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:48 pm
How does section 1021 of the NDAA affect this dispute? [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:36 pm
§ 171.098(a)(1) (West 2011) (party may appeal an order denying an pplication to compel arbitration under section 171.021); see Tex. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:36 pm
§ 171.098(a)(1) (West 2011) (party may appeal an order denying an pplication to compel arbitration under section 171.021); see Tex. [read post]
