Search for: "Does 1-27"
Results 9961 - 9980
of 12,455
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2011, 10:58 am
Marino does not change the outcome. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 8:16 am
Nelson, 27 So. 3d 758 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010) (“The trial court does not have inherent authority to assess costs against the State Attorney’s Office in criminal cases. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 3:31 am
"Trademark Act Section 1(a)(3)(D), 15 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 11:08 am
”[26] Thus there would be no breakup of an existing Indian family by termination of his parental rights; and ICWA should not apply to the case.[27] Oklahoma adopted the existing Indian family doctrine in two cases in 1985. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 11:08 am
”[26] Thus there would be no breakup of an existing Indian family by termination of his parental rights; and ICWA should not apply to the case.[27] Oklahoma adopted the existing Indian family doctrine in two cases in 1985. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 1:45 pm
Does anyone know? [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 8:09 am
AHI’s definitions of slums 1. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 6:08 am
Jennings, supra (quoting Tennessee Code § 27-1-122). [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 11:56 pm
STELIOS HAJI-IOANNOU v (1) MICHAEL O’LEARY (2) RYANAIR LTD 15/7/2010 27. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 6:08 pm
The officer observes each of the subject's eyes for three signs: (1) the ability of the eye to smoothly track or pursue the stimulus as it moves left and right in the subject's visual field. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 5:13 pm
Aronson, --- So.3d ----, 2010 WL 4226204 (Fla. 3d DCA Oct 27, 2010) In July of 1996 Mr. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 12:52 pm
The class at issue in the sewer connection fee ordinance is fixed according to location, but this does not render the ordinance unconstitutional, unless there is no substantial justification for creating the class. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 10:27 am
The new suitability rule does not alter that conclusion. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 10:27 am
The new suitability rule does not alter that conclusion. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:50 am
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2010/12/27/09-10063.pdf McCullough v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 12:30 am
Smith (Georgia does not have a state Religious Freedom Restoration Act). [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 1:57 pm
Only at the very end of the opinion does the majority give us a glimpse of its true feelings, when it observes: The legal principles and requirements we set forth are well established in our case law and our statutes. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 1:01 pm
(Ross Ramsey at the Texas Tribune walks through all this in more detail, for those interested.)What does this mean for policing and corrections? [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 7:19 am
Donaghey in paragraph 27 is whether Ms. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 11:30 pm
This post does not put forward any radical suggestions for change, but pleads, instead, for our future political representatives and legislators to consider two related basic points: 1. [read post]
