Search for: "Little v State"
Results 9961 - 9980
of 26,842
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2014, 1:00 am
Where law on the books appears, as when state laws relating to jury selection become an issue at the trials, it becomes quickly obvious how little statutory mandates dictated the actual workings of the legal system. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 1:29 pm
Supreme Court decided Maryland v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 8:33 am
Cases of interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 7:09 pm
Sandifer v. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 2:29 pm
” AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Catnwell v. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 6:44 am
Bill Cosby has been in the news a little bit. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 9:51 am
Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm
In Biden v. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 6:43 am
The defendant in United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 3:15 pm
In particular, the court found guidance in the opinions of the state Supreme Court in cases such as Hecla Mining v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 7:59 am
On November 10, 2011, the Sixth Circuit issued its decision in Pilgrim, et al. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 12:56 am
Anyone who can remember the events leading up to the inclusion of an employee invention code in the Patents Act 1977, and who can recall the reasons why it took the form it did, will know that the legislature had little or no idea what it was doing and may have passed the whole of sections 39 to 42 in a zombie-like legal vegitative state. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 2:01 pm
The name of the case is Grady v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 5:29 pm
Justice Stevens depicted the petitioners' view of immunity as "a strange proposition" - and Deputy Solicitor General Neal Katyal, arguing for the United States and the petitioners, agreed it "seems a little odd. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 5:26 pm
Supreme Court opinion in Mayo Collaborative Services v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 10:33 am
Barger v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 5:19 pm
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
(579) Yet, as Fulton v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 8:05 am
Although the Court did not grant all the fees requested, finding the hourly rate a little high and the hours excessive, the final award was $331,674.35. [read post]
