Search for: "MATTER OF C A" Results 9961 - 9980 of 36,784
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2019, 11:35 am by Lev Sugarman
" The order, issued by Judge Rosemary Collyer, denied attorney Thomas C. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 8:12 am by Katherine Kiziah
The JPML granted the Transfer Order after finding the lawsuits “involve common factual questions arising out of allegations that defendants’ Combat Arms earplugs were defective, causing plaintiffs to develop hearing loss and/or tinnitus…[c]entralization will eliminate duplicative discovery; prevent inconsistent rulings on Daubert issues and other pretrial matters; and conserve the resources of the parties, their counsel, and the judiciary. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 8:12 am by Katherine Kiziah
The JPML granted the Transfer Order after finding the lawsuits “involve common factual questions arising out of allegations that defendants’ Combat Arms earplugs were defective, causing plaintiffs to develop hearing loss and/or tinnitus…[c]entralization will eliminate duplicative discovery; prevent inconsistent rulings on Daubert issues and other pretrial matters; and conserve the resources of the parties, their counsel, and the judiciary. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 8:12 am by Katherine Kiziah
The JPML granted the Transfer Order after finding the lawsuits “involve common factual questions arising out of allegations that defendants’ Combat Arms earplugs were defective, causing plaintiffs to develop hearing loss and/or tinnitus…[c]entralization will eliminate duplicative discovery; prevent inconsistent rulings on Daubert issues and other pretrial matters; and conserve the resources of the parties, their counsel, and the judiciary. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 5:34 am
 In summary, the EBA found in G 2/12 (Broccoli/Tomato II) that Article 53(c) did not exclude plants produced by essential biological processes from patentability. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 1:11 am by Stephen Page
A Simplified Approach to Property Division Recommendation 11 The Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) should be amended to:  specify the steps that a court will take when considering whether to make an order to alter the interests of the parties to the relationship in any property; [HOORAY]andsimplify the list of matters that a court may take into account when considering whether to make an order to alter the interests of the parties to the relationship in any property. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 8:50 am by Leah Litman
The respondent, Maurice Davis, counters that the government’s interpretation of Section 924(c) would be both unpredictable and sweeping, and would leave matters to the whim of juries, generating conflicting results. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 8:29 am by Matthew Schoonover
For some businesses, it might not matter whether their size is calculated under a three-year or five-year period—they’d be small (or large) regardless. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am by Eugene Volokh
A similar showing might not be required as a First Amendment matter as to speech about matters of purely private concern. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am by Eugene Volokh
A similar showing might not be required as a First Amendment matter as to speech about matters of purely private concern. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:27 am by Administrator
Cook’s conduct in this matter. [read post]