Search for: "Mark Cover"
Results 9961 - 9980
of 18,230
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2014, 1:44 pm
That marks quite a change from before, gauging by defense counsel’s past complaints about their inability to speak with Al-Nashiri freely, about what the CIA did to him. [read post]
28 May 2014, 12:05 pm
Examples of some recent publications that may be of interest include: IRS Published Covered Compensation Table For 2014 J.P. [read post]
28 May 2014, 4:19 am
Lyle Denniston covered the opinion for this blog; other coverage comes from Nina Totenberg of NPR, Adam Liptak of The New York Times, Mark Walsh at Education Week’s School Law Blog, and Max Slater of JURIST. [read post]
27 May 2014, 11:30 pm
The UK also provides technical assistance to developing countries under the TRIPS Agreement (Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights).Jihan met with staff from our International Policy, Innovation, Enforcement, Copyright and Trade Marks directorates as well as with external stakeholders. [read post]
27 May 2014, 4:58 pm
Mark Martins, had this to say on the eve of a pre-trial motions hearing in United States v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 3:21 am
In light of Donald Sterling, racism was one of the topics covered. [read post]
27 May 2014, 2:43 am
This blogger has had first hand experience of a Zambian trade mark lawyer advising that an international designation of a client covering Zambia was unlikely to be given effect, which then became significant problem because of this Supreme Court decision refusing to recognise user rights in an opposition in Zambia. [read post]
26 May 2014, 12:02 pm
"The disclosure marked a rare instance in which a CIA officer working overseas had his cover — the secrecy meant to protect his actual identity — pierced by his own government. [read post]
26 May 2014, 12:00 pm
Ct. at 1289, 1293, 1297-98 (quotation marks omitted). [read post]
25 May 2014, 9:16 pm
This first decade was marked not only by the Court issuing its first judgment, in the Lubanga case, but also by numerous challenges which it has had to resolve. [read post]
24 May 2014, 2:06 pm
The House Financial Services has marked up and approved a number of pieces of securities legislation most of which are designed to enhance capital formation and some of which appear to have strong bi-partisan support. [read post]
22 May 2014, 3:51 am
Lyle Denniston covered the story for this blog; other coverage comes from Richard Wolf of USA Today and from Robert Barnes and Mark Berman of The Washington Post, while Rick Hasen discusses the case and the Court’s order at his Election Law Blog. [read post]
21 May 2014, 4:04 pm
The Member Survey indicates that 25% of members read the CLLR from cover to cover and another 42% read some but not all of the articles.Copyright Committee:The Committee posted an article on the CALL/ACBD committee space and the CALL/ACBD blog on the Authors Guild v Google Books, Inc.and Authors Guild v HathiTrustlitigation in the US. [read post]
20 May 2014, 9:18 am
Mark Liberman (Language Log) for the pointer. [read post]
20 May 2014, 2:01 am
And sure enough, the FCC’s 2014 Quadrennial Regulatory Review (2014 Quad Reg Review) decision has now been published in the Federal Register in two separate parts – one covering the Report and Order component and the other covering the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) component. [read post]
19 May 2014, 4:24 pm
The Senate Banking Committee marked up, approved and favorably reported to the full Senate, by a bi-partisan vote of 13-9, the Housing Finance Reform and Taxpayer Protection Act of 2013, S. 1217, which represents a sweeping overhaul of the current mortgage finance and securitization system. [read post]
19 May 2014, 7:26 am
Indeed, it appears the more recent description of services covering Visa’s single-letter V mark is a little more intellectually honest, given the submitted specimen of use: “Restaurant services, namely, restaurant reservation services, and restaurant ratings and reviews, providing information in the field of fine dining restaurants and fine dining events. [read post]
19 May 2014, 6:35 am
Under the terms of the settlement, Schneider will pay $21 million in unpaid wages, interest, and penalties for federal and state-law wage violations covering a ten-year period. [read post]
19 May 2014, 6:12 am
With regard to the induced infringement, the Court wrote that the fact that the plaintiff and defendant are competitors in producing the goods covered by the patents-in-suit, that the plaintiff marked its goods with the pertinent patents, and that industry trade publications mentioned the existence of the plaintiff’s patents all gave rise to the inference that the defendant knew of the patents or turned a willful blind eye to their existence. [read post]
19 May 2014, 5:00 am
The court stated that “Fees can serve regulatory purposes in two ways: either by discouraging particular conduct through the device of making it more costly, or by generating income ear marked to cover the cost of regulation. [read post]
