Search for: "United States v. Close" Results 9961 - 9980 of 14,197
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2015, 5:41 pm by Dr. Shezad Malik
There have been eight Actos Bladder Cancer trials to date across the United States. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 8:40 am by Victoria Kwan
., also took an overseas trip: on July 9, he delivered a lecture entitled “Roles of the Chief Justice of the United States” at the University of Tokyo. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 3:09 am
Let me suggest, however, that the Department of Justice, and then the United States Supreme Court, explicitly refused to place the CRA into a genuinely transformative framework. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 2:42 pm by JB
Two interesting amicus briefs in Obergefell v. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 2:49 pm by Elizabeth Kruska
 Our friends the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Chapter I, Article 11 of the Vermont Constitution deal with unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 9:48 am
But what began as a discussion about specific sexual harassment opinions seemed to transform into a debate over the state of feminism in the United States. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 5:48 pm by Rick
There’s been a lot written lately regarding the recent United States Supreme Court ruling in Padilla v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo announced that the United States will formally withdraw from the Paris climate agreement. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 12:25 am by Marie Louise
-Conn (IPKat) (EPLAW) EWHC (Ch): All threats, no action…: Best Buy Co Inc and another v Worldwide Sales Corporation Espana SL (IPKat)   United States  US General California’s Trade Secret disclosure statute doesn’t apply in Federal Court – or maybe it does (IP ADR Blog) US Patents USPTO wants to change restriction practice (Patent Baristas) The post-Bilski landscape: Why some tried, but failed, to ban ‘business method’… [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 5:44 pm by Dennis Crouch
Mirowski Family Ventures, LLC, No. 16-470 (how closely must a state court “hew” federal court patent law precedents?) [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 8:10 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  Additionally, on January 5, 2018, the United States Department of Labor (“DOL”) announced that going forward, it would utilize the primary beneficiary test. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 7:59 am by Erin Miller
Discussion of the Citizens United decision continues. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 11:55 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Additionally, the United States Supreme Court recently granted certiorari on another case involving the reliability of eyewitness identification. [read post]