Search for: ""JOHN DOES" 1 THROUGH 10" Results 81 - 100 of 173
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2014, 12:08 pm by Cicely Wilson
Does 1-1058, USDC (5/27/14)Civil Procedure, Copyright, Intellectual Property, Internet Law, Legal EthicsAF Holdings, represented by Prenda Law, filed suit in district court against 1,058 unnamed John Does who it alleged had illegally downloaded and shared the pornographic film “Popular Demand” using a file-sharing service known as BitTorrent. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 5:15 am
There, ACT sued ten John Doe defendants based on allegedly defamatory comments posted anonymously on `Random Convergence,’ an internet blog administered by Daniel Drasin, located at http:// randomconvergence.blogspot.com/ (the `Blog’). [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 3:42 pm by David Fraser
Marijuana privacy breach class action blog postThis afternoon, my firm filed a statement of claim in the Federal Court against Health Canada (John Doe v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 5:02 am by Susan Brenner
 He was sentenced to “a bad-conduct discharge, 12 months of confinement, and reduction to E–1. [read post]
20 May 2013, 6:00 am by David Kris
  The uncertainty here is obviously less severe than with respect to the location of targets, since the government’s own collection conduct is at issue, but there may be complexities that arise with advancing technology. 10. [read post]
3 May 2013, 9:33 am by Jonathan Bailey
The defendant in question is listed only as John Doe and identified solely by his IP address. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 12:03 pm by Ken
Here's what the order does, and the significance of its terms. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 10:44 am by Ken
John Does 110, No. 2:12-cv-01642-RGK-SSx, slip op. at 4 (C.D. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 4:56 am by Susan Brenner
On February 1, 2011, Doe contacted Castro to retrieve the seized items. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 6:31 am by Peter Steinmeyer
It also included claims against defendants “John Does 1-10” for Breach of the Duty of Loyalty and Breach of Fiduciary Duty for improperly disclosing certain confidential, proprietary and/or internal business information to third parties, including David. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 5:31 am by Peter (Pete) A. Steinmeyer
It also included claims against defendants “John Does 1-10” for Breach of the Duty of Loyalty and Breach of Fiduciary Duty for improperly disclosing certain confidential, proprietary and/or internal business information to third parties, including David. [read post]