Search for: ""Terry v. Ohio" OR "392 U.S. 1"" Results 81 - 100 of 123
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2007, 8:52 pm
Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), were appropriately applied to the context of a motor vehicle stop, and we said that the Terry principles authorized the balancing of the level of intrusiveness of the use of the dog "against the importance of the governmental interest at stake. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 2:30 pm
Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, this Court held that a "stop and frisk" may be conducted without violating the Fourth Amendment's ban on unreasonable searches and seizures if two conditions are met. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 6:28 am
Ohio392 U.S. 1, (1968) (other citation omitted)).The Court of Appeals then explained that  Chief Gallimore's initial contact with defendant was consensual, as indicated in several of the trial court's findings of fact: . . [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 7:41 am by MBettman
Ohio392 U.S. 1 (1968) (When police officers have a reasonable suspicion that a crime has just occurred or is about to occur they may engage in a limited search of a person to check for weapons. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 2:00 am
Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 8-9 (1968), Katz v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 8:36 am by Bob Farb
Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), stop as well as a traffic stop; and (2) that during a valid but forcible encounter, the officer reasonably suspects that the person is armed and therefore dangerous [the court’s underlining]. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 8:36 am by Bob Farb
Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), stop as well as a traffic stop; and (2) that during a valid but forcible encounter, the officer reasonably suspects that the person is armed and therefore dangerous [the court’s underlining]. [read post]