Search for: ""Terry v. Ohio" OR "392 U.S. 1""
Results 81 - 100
of 123
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2010, 12:17 pm
Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 6:02 am
Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 29-31, 88 S. [read post]
16 Jan 2010, 2:30 pm
Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968). [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 5:47 am
Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 9 (1968); Elkins v. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 10:21 am
In State v. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 4:41 am
Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed2d 889 (1968). [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 3:19 am
Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968) which did establish "reasonable suspicion" as the standard for investigatory stops (as opposed to the higher standard of "probable cause" for arrests). [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 6:40 am
Ohio 392 U.S. 1 (1968)? [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 9:00 pm
Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968) -- was in progress, and not an arrest. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 5:01 pm
Ohio at jrank.org:"Terry v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 5:54 am
Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 24-25, 88 S. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 5:48 am
Ohio, 392 U.S. 1. [read post]
22 May 2009, 2:44 pm
Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968) (ninety minute detention of traveler's luggage based only on reasonable suspicion was improper). [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), the Court found in Michigan v. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 3:50 am
Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 30, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 9:00 pm
Terry v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 2:30 pm
Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, this Court held that a "stop and frisk" may be conducted without violating the Fourth Amendment's ban on unreasonable searches and seizures if two conditions are met. [read post]
17 Jan 2009, 1:48 pm
Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 23-24, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968) (upholding pat-frisk for weapons to protect officer safety during investigatory stop). [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 1:52 pm
Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 8:46 pm
Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), which creates an exception to the warrant requirement of the Fourth Amendment when officers conduct a brief, investigatory stop based on "reasonable, articulable suspicion that criminal activity is afoot. [read post]
