Search for: "*/**u.s. v. Brand" Results 81 - 100 of 3,402
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2012, 3:48 pm
 It's difficult to quantify the costs that such closed rules impose on businesses and workers, but a recent examination of US job creation demonstrates that they could be significant (h/t Mark Perry): Since the recession ended in June 2009, almost three out of every four jobs added to U.S. payrolls have been in Right to Work states (1.86 million out of 2.59 million), even though those 22 states represent only 38.8% of the U.S. population (120 million). [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 8:28 pm
City of Boca Raton, 524 U.S. 775, 807 (1998) and Burlington Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 9:00 am by Kalvis Golde
., the justices will hear oral argument in Lucky Brand Dungarees v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 2:41 am
True, the brand is heavily advertised, but that has translated neither into steady profits (or the near-term likelihood of such) within the U.S., nor relentlessly successful expansion abroad. [read post]