Search for: "*u. S. v. Perez" Results 81 - 100 of 116
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2008, 5:35 am
See Justice Alito’s introduction in Gomez-Perez v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 7:29 am by Joel R. Brandes
          In Matter of Michael R v Amanda R, ___AD3d___, 2019 WL 4264401 (1stDept., 2019) the first and only day of trial on the father’s enforcement petition took place on February 2, 2016 before the Support Magistrate. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am by Paula Junghans
These allegations are consistent with the Department of Justice’s court filings in Cohen’s federal criminal case. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relists. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 7:40 am by Joy Waltemath
Asked whether the Court was in some way signaling federal agencies that it will be taking a closer look at significant changes in long-established administrative policies, Employment Law Daily advisory board member Richard Gerakitis (Troutman Sanders LLP) responded, “Actually, I think that SCOTUS gave us this signal back in Perez v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 4:35 pm by Aurora Barnes
United States 17-6856 Issue: Whether the “separate sovereign” concept actually exists when Congress’s plenary power over Indian tribes and the general erosion of any real tribal sovereignty is amplified by the Northern Cheyenne Tribe’s constitution in such a way that the petitioner’s prosecutions in both tribal and federal court violate the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 6:07 pm by Aurora Barnes
United States 17-6856 Issue: Whether the “separate sovereign” concept actually exists when Congress’s plenary power over Indian tribes and the general erosion of any real tribal sovereignty is amplified by the Northern Cheyenne Tribe’s constitution in such a way that the petitioner’s prosecutions in both tribal and federal court violate the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U. [read post]