Search for: "*u.s. v. Austin"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,500
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2023, 7:45 am
The new rules are at odds with U.S. law. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 5:01 am
After we decided Wasden, the Supreme Court [in City of Austin v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:31 am
The group was founded by Edward Blum, a conservative activist who had also spearheaded a challenge to the admissions policy at the University of Texas at Austin as well as to Shelby County v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:19 pm
Wirtz, 392 U.S. 183, 196 (1968). [read post]
17 May 2023, 9:00 pm
In Price v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 5:01 am
Legal Arguments in the Texas Suit In their motion for summary judgment, plaintiffs in Joseph Van Loon et al. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 2:39 pm
(He has a bad habit of ignoring unhelpful precedent; See U.S. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 11:43 am
Frese v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 8:00 am
"Since such conduct violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the EEOC filed its lawsuit (EEOC v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
Goertz, the U.S. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 3:06 pm
Austin, 62 F.4th 1114, 1119 (8th Cir. 2023); Dunn v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 3:48 am
U.S. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 3:34 pm
Reagan Outdoor Advertising, Inc v City of Austin, 2023 WL 270582 (5th Circ. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 10:54 am
DiGiacomo v. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 12:30 pm
Then in City of Austin v. [read post]
How Has Blockchain Technology Fared in China? –from a case study of LRB to the most recent NFT cases
27 Mar 2023, 9:50 am
By Cynthia Li Little Red Book (“LRB” in the rest of the blog), the leading Chinese lifestyle social media and E-commerce platform indulges its over 200 million monthly active users with a metaverse experience. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 7:48 am
The plaintiffs request a preliminary injunction, and U.S. [read post]
18 Mar 2023, 8:04 pm
The U.S. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 5:13 am
Simmons, Sabrina Siddiqui, and Austin Ramzy report for the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 7:47 pm
Prometheus, 566 U.S. 66 (2012); Alice Corp. v. [read post]
