Search for: "*u.s. v. Beard"
Results 81 - 100
of 388
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2014, 1:04 pm
LEXIS 14460 (ED TX, Feb. 4, 2014), a Texas federal magistrate judge granted a Muslim inmate a TRO and preliminary injunction allowing him to wear a one-quarter inch beard, but denied a TRO and preliminary injunction on his request to wear a full beard and to wear his kufi cap throughout the prison at all times.In Reiske v. [read post]
3 May 2015, 7:34 am
In Herbert v. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 8:34 am
In Adams v. [read post]
19 Jan 2013, 12:00 am
In Beard v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
Triple Canopy, Inc., Civil Action No.1:23-cv-1500), in U.S. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
In Al Saud v. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 1:55 pm
LEXIS 103201, May 25, 2018) and allowed a Muslim inmate to move ahead with his complaint that he was not permitted to grow long hair and a beard. [read post]
16 Nov 2008, 1:05 pm
In Charleston v. [read post]
18 May 2014, 9:36 am
Johnson, 2014 U.S. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 7:56 pm
Beard, 2011 U.S. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 7:33 am
Beard, 2017 U.S. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 6:44 pm
Blood, 2017 U.S. [read post]
22 May 2016, 9:12 am
Beard, 2016 U.S. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 8:11 am
In Shehee v. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 11:09 am
In Dulaney v. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
In Grief v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 6:29 am
Brathwaite, 432 U.S. 98, 97 S. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm
It allowed him to proceed with RLUIPA, but not 1st Amendment, claims regarding beard length and group Jum'ah services.In Miller v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
LEXIS 82582 (DD, May 15, 2018), an Idaho federal magistrate judge concluded that sufficient facts had been alleged for a Muslim inmate to move ahead with his claim that he should be permitted to grow four-inch beard and wear a kufi at all times.In Pouncil v. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 12:09 pm
LEXIS 126228 (ND IL, Aug. 9, 2017), an Illinois federal district court dismissed a Rastafarian inmate's complaint that his dreadlocks and beard were removed forcibly.In Simmons v. [read post]