Search for: "5 Parole Judges" Results 81 - 100 of 1,234
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2019, 7:34 pm by Jamie Markham
A dissenting judge would have affirmed the sentence of life without parole. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 2:02 pm
Shane's mother, Bertha Jean Coffman, pleaded guilty and was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole by Cleveland County District Judge Tom Lucas. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 9:20 am by Steve Hall
Yet the nine justices stand sharply divided on the issue, as the 5-4 split this week shows. [read post]
10 May 2015, 6:23 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Another 4.75 million Americans are subject to the state supervision imposed by probation or parole. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 12:39 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
The decision about whether to “parole” a foreign entrepreneur under this rule will be a discretionary determination made by the Secretary of Homeland Security on a case-by-case basis (INA Section 212(d)(5), 8 U.S.C. 1182(d)(5)). [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 8:05 pm
  Concurrent with this sentence were 4-5 year prison sentences for indecent assault and battery on a person over 14. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 2:36 am
Some critics of Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Peter Espinoza's order temporarily staying enforcement of the sex offender residency restrictions of Jessica's Law, reported by The Times on Nov. 5, are exploiting the legitimate fears of decent people. [read post]
15 May 2007, 10:56 am
State of Indiana, a 10-page, 5-0 opinion, Justice Dickson writes:The defendant, Aaron Michael Rohr, was convicted for the murder of five-year-old Samuel Moore and sentenced to life in prison without the possibility for parole. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 12:20 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
" (The message here to judges and CSCD directors: Use it or lose it!) [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 1:59 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
One possibility is that sentencing judges in the tough-on-crime 1990’s were overestimating, and overcompensating for, the lenience of the parole board. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 4:41 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
DHS the challengers asserted that the program exceeded the parole authority given to the administration under INA 212(d)(5) as it can be used ‘only on a case-by-case basis for urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit’”. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 9:49 am by Steven Ballard
 This was a 5-4 decision of the Supreme Court back in June of 2012. [read post]
2 May 2007, 8:31 am
LVRJ 5/2/07 Assembly panel looks at appointing judges. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 3:58 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Section 212(d)(5) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) authorizes the Secretary of Homeland Security, in his discretion, to parole noncitizens into the United States temporarily on a case-by-case basis for urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit. [read post]
18 May 2012, 12:22 pm by Rekha Arulanantham
Judging by his answer, not even the government seems to know how to get off the watch list. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 8:28 am
  According to Sam Stanton and Denny Walsh's reporting in the Sacbee, Garrido was prosecuted by Nevada, but his public defender convinced the judge to make the 5 year to Life state sentence concurrent with the 50 to Life federal sentence, arguing that Garrido was already serving 50 years and facing California felony charges. [read post]