Search for: "A. A. READ, Appeals Examiner"
Results 81 - 100
of 11,545
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2011, 10:10 am
The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals reversed a decision yesterday where the Fourth Court of Appeals in San Antonio allowed Bexar County trial prosecutors to make an end-run around basic constitutional hearsay protections in a case where the defendant was accused of sexually abusing his step-daughter. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 6:53 pm
By Christopher Dunn *** In an 8-1 decision written by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, liberal and conservative justices agreed that the Court of Appeals’ position that prosecutors were free to introduce hearsay evidence without an opportunity to cross-examine if the defense had created a “misleading impression” violated the Sixth Amendment’s Confrontation Clause. *** Read more… [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 2:50 pm
Takeaway: The Examiner isn't allowed to just pick random pieces of a drawing and read it on parts of your claim. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 12:57 pm
Continue reading [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 11:44 am
A representative claim on appeal read: 25. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 11:34 am
A representative claim on appeal read: 25. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 1:51 pm
If the Track One prioritized examination program is any indicator, we expect the Fast-Track Appeals Pilot Program to be a success. [read post]
1 May 2018, 3:36 pm
Take a read of what they wrote in dissents to the denial of cert in the Mathis appeal. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 6:56 pm
Also, the patent owner contended that the Court of Appeal had examined the novelty of the product, whereas the claims protected a specific use of such product. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 6:18 am
(Emphasis added Lessons Learned: Read an Examiner's 35 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 9:26 am
The comment thread for that post is worth reading too. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 12:15 pm
Additionally, the mailing of a final Office action, a filing of a Notice of Appeal, abandonment of the application, or a notice of allowance will also remove the application from its prioritized status. [read post]
26 Dec 2021, 2:36 am
This requirement is provided for by the EPO Guidelines for Examination (F-IV-4.4). [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 6:51 am
Continue reading The post Determining the Success of A Personal Injury Appeal appeared first on Boston Injury Attorney Blog. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 11:55 am
The McCartneys filed an appeal. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 10:10 am
Read on for the answer. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 11:08 pm
What if I wanted to ask the witness to read something? [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 10:10 am
(Read the official notice here.) [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 3:35 pm
” The Court of Appeal noted that the affidavit said to be deceptive had not been tested, was not the subject of cross-examination, and the respondent’s evidence was not contradicted. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 7:15 am
As previously discussed, BC Courts take a broad view of relevance when it comes to examination for discovery. [read post]
