Search for: "ACCC General"
Results 81 - 100
of 147
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2014, 10:34 am
September 23, 2014 In the advertising law world, general impressions matter – a lot. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 9:40 am
Because the AUCC and ACCC withdrew their objections and withdrew from the proceedings, it is unclear as to who, if anyone, on the “objector” side would have the legal status – not to mention both the will and the resources – to seek judicial review in the event that the outcome might call for it. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:57 am
See: ACCC takes action against Electrodry alleging fake testimonials or reviews. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 6:04 pm
Blue Cross conspiracy (market allocation) lawsuit to proceed judge rules: http://www.al.com/news/index.ssf/2014/06/blue_cross_conspiracy_lawsuit.html Ad law: Australian ACCC takes action against Jetstar and Virgin for alleged drip pricing practices: ACCC: http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-takes-action-against-jetstar-and-virgin-for-drip-pricing-practices Ad law: California Art Institutes Settle Claim Over Alleged Deceptive Marketing Practices for $4.4 million:… [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 8:12 am
Apps: Australian ACCC: ACCC Shopper App. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 9:06 am
See: ACCC Acts on Beer Labelling. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 2:35 am
Put simply, the ACCC alleges that Pfizer misused the market power it held during the term of its patent to restrict competition from generic substitutes after the patent expired.A patent is, of course, inherently ‘anticompetitive’, in that it provides the patentee with exclusive rights to exploit the claimed invention commercially. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 9:30 pm
For example, they point to the EPA’s cost-benefit analysis of the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule, in which the agency estimated that the rule would generate $280 billion in annual net benefits, avoiding up to 34,000 premature deaths per year. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 3:13 pm
As a general rule,comments received later than the date by whichparticipants must present or file oral or writtenarguments will not be considered. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 3:41 pm
In due course,the Board will forward these comments to participants.Comments can be sent to the Secretary General of the Copyright Board, Mr. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 9:01 am
In the latter case, a claim may be offside where its “general impression” is false or misleading – for example, through a headline claim that is contradicted by a disclaimer or fine print; where two true claims are made, but by being made together create an overall false general impression; where significant conditions or limitations are not adequately disclosed; or where a picture or illustration creates, for example, a false general impression… [read post]
16 May 2013, 9:59 am
In a curious case posted by the Australian ACCC earlier today (or was that yesterday?) [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:23 am
Tim Davie, acting director general, said that redactions were “driven by external legal advice. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 9:15 am
(2) Nothing in the succeeding provisions of this Division shall be taken as limiting by implication the generality of sub-section (1). [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 2:15 pm
The main ones emanate so far from U of T and ACCC. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 1:18 pm
As a Facebook page can be used to engage with customers, the Board further considered that the Code applies to the content generated by the page creator as well as material or comments posted by users or friends. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 1:38 pm
Such misunderstanding may perhaps have contributed to the recent agreements of UofT/Western to signed licenses, and AUCC, and ACCC to model licenses that are 800% in the case of universities and 300% in the case of community colleges more expensive and more restrictive than the pre CCH v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 9:17 am
An Australian federal court held a hearing on Friday morning wherein Apple agreed to pay the fine—in addition to AUS$300,000 in commission costs—just a couple months after the third-generation iPad's launch. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 4:43 am
In accordance with being primarily publicly funded, your mission statement includes the essential role of ECOS as “provid[ing] for the exchange of ideas … among states and with others,”3 The stage you provide should thus be inclusive of all points of view.Further, despite ECOS being publicly funded, your website identifies the Edison Electric Institute and the American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity (ACCCE) among the industry “supporters” of this… [read post]
3 May 2012, 7:03 am
In a recent ACCC web poll at ConsumerCredit.com, just 8 percent reported an increased need for education on how to save for retirement or college, while only 14 percent were interested in learning more about saving in general. [read post]
