Search for: "ACE EUROPEAN GROUP, LIMITED"
Results 81 - 100
of 135
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2010, 1:05 am
Wall Street Journal ([2007] 1 AC 359). [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 5:47 pm
The key issue is whether the cost of bringing a claim is disproportionate to “the true value of the vindication available to a claimant” (Cristiano Ronaldo v Telegraph Media Group Limited [2010] EWHC 2710 (QB) at [61]). [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
Comments from various contributors are interspersed throughout the text and there is a group discussion at the end. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
Comments from various contributors are interspersed throughout the text and there is a group discussion at the end. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 am
Ace Hardware Corp. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 8:41 am
Lachaux v Independent Print, Supreme Court to hear “serious harm” appeal On Tuesday and Wednesday 13 and 14 November 2018, the Supreme Court (Lords Kerr, Wilson, Sumption, Hodge and Briggs) will hear the appeal in Lachaux v Independent Print Limited & Anor UKSC 2017/0175, against the Court of Appeal decision of Davis LJ, with whom MacFarlane and Sharp LJJ concurred ([2017] EWCA Civ 1334). [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 3:57 am
bit.ly/z0gKPr (Eddie Sheehy) OpenText Positioned as Enterprise Content Management Leader by Two Independent Research Firms – bit.ly/ysfti9 (Global Research) OrcaTec Unveils eDiscovery at a Flat Monthly Fee - bit.ly/yevEVV (PR Web) PA Consulting Group Acquires 7Safe [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 4:18 pm
Judgement was handed down in Stadler v Currys Group Ltd [2022] EWHC 160 (QB) on the 1 February 2022. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 7:37 am
One points up a very good example of something referred to recently by the Master of the Rolls in his lecture to the European Circuit of the Bar. [read post]
1 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Disclosures to third parties may also qualify as “protected disclosures” but in more limited circumstances which vary according to the category of third party the disclosure is made to.[8] Wide disclosures, such as those to the media, will only be protected in narrow circumstances, and must be shown to be reasonable and not made for personal gain, amongst other things. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:47 am
It would seem “quite wrong” for this court to interpret Article 6 of the Convention as laying down an absolute exclusionary rule of evidence that goes any wider than Strasbourg has already clearly decided to be the case: this was the application of the “Ullah principle” - Lord Bingham’s well known aphorism in (Ullah) v Special Adjudicator [2004] 2 AC 323 at para 20. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:57 pm
The natural and ordinary meaning Citing Lord Bridge in Charleston v News Group Newspapers [1995] 2 AC 65, Master Bell emphasised that in order to determine the natural and ordinary meaning of the words of which a plaintiff complains, one must consider the context in which the words were used and the mode of publication [8]. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am
The article finds settlement “inevitable” given the UK decision in Bloomberg LP v ZXC [2022] AC 1158 AC. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 1:40 pm
Please leave comments over at the AC&P Blog. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 5:37 pm
In order to provide the potential educational benefits of recorded classes to our students, the SIA has decided to automatically record, and to archive for a limited period of time, all class sessions occurring in classrooms in the Katz Building. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 7:02 am
It is not enough that some persons actually engage in the art at the material time laboured under a particular prejudice if a substantial number of others did not (Re Glaxo Group Ltd’s Patent [2004] RPC 43). [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:42 pm
It found that the repetition rule is irrelevant to the threshold of seriousness and that “nothing in the 2013 Act can be taken as implicitly abolishing it or limiting its application” [23]. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
” Should accuse advocacy groups like MADD that have lead a decades long propaganda campaign against our core values? [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 3:52 am
’ ([2001] 1 AC 127, 201 per Lord Nicholls.) [read post]
