Search for: "ANDREWS v. GOOD" Results 81 - 100 of 1,967
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2023, 5:50 am by Tobias Lutzi
Many thanks to Professor Andrew Dickinson for his comments on an earlier draft. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 1:43 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Dhenne Avocats)
This being the case, the court notes that this WO’652 document reveals tests, resulting in the determination of “most preferred” compounds with very good affinity and in particular a Ki # 0.001 μM. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
It defines Scope 3 emissions as “indirect upstream and downstream greenhouse gas emissions, other than scope 2 emissions, from sources that the reporting entity does not own or directly control and may include, but are not limited to, purchased goods and services, business travel, employee commutes, and processing and use of sold products. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm by Kluwer Patent blogger
“ Top 3 Kluwer Trademark Blog posts   1) Good for the Goose: Own goal for Lidl in future lookalike cases by Julius Stobbs, Amelia Sainsbury and Nirmal Trivedy “This post is the first of four looking at the decision of Smith J in Lidl & another v Tesco & another [2023] EWHC 873 (Ch). [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 4:31 am by Norman L. Eisen
We endeavor to look at that report with skeptical eyes as prosecutors do, to narrow the case to what can confidently be proven to a jury, and for the first time anywhere to consider at length, and of course in good faith, Trump’s defenses and how they will fare. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am by Eugene Volokh
It's based on amicus briefs that Michael Dorf (Cornell), Andrew Koppelman (Northwestern), and I filed in past cases (and that I blogged about before), but it elaborates somewhat further on that argument. [read post]
The judgment is also interesting because it is the first time the court has really focused on the question of interest on past licensing fees (interest on past licensing fees is in issue in InterDigital v Lenovo, but the question of whether it is payable and in what amount was adjourned to a later hearing). [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm by admin
Marsh, “Separating the good guys and gals from the bad,” 126 Br. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 12:53 am by INFORRM
Canada On 7 June 2023, Madam Justice Forth handed down judgement in the case of Wang and Good Castle Real Estate Development v Lui 2023 BCSC 972. [read post]