Search for: "APPLIED COMPANIES V ARMY" Results 81 - 100 of 355
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
Resultly http://t.co/R7rhwI0Xqo -> GA Supreme Court Fixes Overbroad Injunction Against Message Board Operator–Chan v. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
A data breach compromised personal data of over 100 U.K. army recruits and shut down the army’s online recruitment portal for more than a month. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 2:40 pm
CJEU has its say, speaking of "copyrighted" works but not much of "new" publicEleonora gives an account of this brand-new decision by the Court of Justice of the European Union in SBS Belgium v SABAM Case C-325/14, which concerned the right of communication to the public within Article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29 as applied to TV programmes transmitted via direct injection. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
This applies to pleadings, process, hearings, awards, and appeals, although time periods for appeal are strictly enforced in many jurisdictions. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 1:01 pm by Anna Salvatore
Health Secretary Matt Hancock said afterward that “we will look back on this day, V-Day, as a key moment in the fighback of this terrible disease. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 7:00 am by Dan Maurer
These charging decisions are available to any officer in command—which, in the Army for example—may be as junior and inexperienced as a captain in command of a company or detachment. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 11:56 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
        [1]Watson v Salvation Army The post Interpreting Legal Documents – Ambiguity appeared first on Peter A. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 11:56 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
        [1]Watson v Salvation Army The post Interpreting Legal Documents – Ambiguity appeared first on Peter A. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 5:35 am
OpinionPub DateShort Title/District 07a0287p.06 2007/07/30 Natl Sur Corp v. [read post]