Search for: "ARNOLD, II, V. STATE"
Results 81 - 100
of 265
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2018, 12:45 am
According to Mr Justice Arnold himself, "[t]he case raises important issues of European trade mark law", which necessitates references to the CJEU on issues relating to (i) bad faith for filing with no intention to use and (ii) IP TRANSLATOR clarity issues. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 3:25 pm
Last Friday, in Société Des Produits Nestlé SA v Cadbury UK Ltd [2014] EWHC 16 (Ch), in what for him is quite a short judgment, Mr Justice Arnold gave the plot away in the very first of his 77 paragraphs:"In what circumstances can a trader secure a perpetual monopoly in the shape of a product by registering it as a trade mark? [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 11:55 am
The Article III question is now the subject of a potentially landmark case, al Bahlul v. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 3:17 am
Accordingly, Arnold J. held that Apotex was barred from claiming under the cross-undertaking in damages which Servier had given. [read post]
13 May 2021, 2:24 pm
Arnold is a Senior Director – Legal at the University of Texas/Texas A&M Investment Management Company (UTIMCO). [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 5:38 pm
ARNOLD and TINA ARNOLD, Appellants, v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
Arnold J acknowledged that it passed the Option 1 threshold but not that of Option 2. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 8:42 am
In the wake of the Court’s landmark decision in United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 11:11 am
Eleonora and Hugo Cuddigan QC attended a lively discussion chaired by the Hon Mr Justice Arnold. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
No muesli mix-up likely in the world where rabbits reignSupreme Petfoods Ltd v Henry Bell & Co (Grantham) Ltd [2015] EWHC 256 (Ch) is another blockbuster judgment from Mr Justice Arnold in the High Court, Chancery Division, England and Wales. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 2:44 am
ii. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 3:20 am
The court in Wesley dba MTLFREETV.com v Bell Canada et al 2017 FCA 55 easily rejected this attempt to re-argue the evidence stating: The appellants do not challenge the Federal Court’s finding with respect to the first prong of the test. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 1:00 am
However, with reference to the decision in Arnold v Britton [2015] UKSC 36, the court considered that it is not its job to rescue a tenant from an “imprudent term” in a lease. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 10:55 am
Nothing was more juicy than last month's decision from Mr Justice Carr in Illumnia v Premaitha [2018] EWHC 615 (Pat) in which he dealt with two applications brought by the defendants for (i) strike out of Illumina’s claim on the basis of abuse of process, and (ii) summary judgment against Illumina on the basis of issue estoppel. [read post]
3 May 2018, 11:23 am
United States v Arnold, 117 F.3d 1308 (11th Cir. 1997). [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 12:19 pm
This question related to whether the combination product is protected by the amended patent and stems from the idea advanced by Actavis and by Arnold J in Actavis v Sanofi that the combination product may need to embody a separate inventive advance. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 10:59 pm
Bently's argument that the focus in eBay v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
Amazon's trade mark travails in the USThe doctrine of initial interest confusion [Mr Justice Arnold was in favour here and here; "no, no, no" said the Court of Appeal for England and Wales] is a fascinating doctrine that is of great potential value to trade mark-owning litigants in the United States, where it is still alive and kicking. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 7:53 am
C18-1132-JCC.United States District Court, W.D. [read post]
