Search for: "AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion" Results 81 - 100 of 669
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2017, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
¶ 2, establishes an equal-treatment principle:  A court may invalidate an arbitration agreement based on “generally applicable contract defenses,” but not on legal rules that “apply only to arbitration or that derive their meaning from the fact that an agreement to arbitrate is at issue,” AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
18 May 2017, 7:42 am by Jeremy A. Gunn
Citibank, 2 Cal. 5th 945, 393 P.3d 85, 2017 WL 1279700, at *1 (2017), the court unanimously ruled that the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) does not preempt this state-law rule under AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 4:52 pm by Limore Torbati
  The court held that the Federal Arbitration Act, as construed in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 12:00 am by Michael J. Hassen
I recently contributed an article to Thomson Reuters’ Legal Current on Practical Considerations Regarding Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: After the Supreme Court decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 9:17 am by Beth Graham
Here is the abstract: Justice Scalia’s opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 12:17 pm by Joe Consumer
For example, read the amicus brief filed by the NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc. in the AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
The Dissent Judge Ikuta’s dissent notes that the majority’s reasoning contradicts that in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]