Search for: "AT & T v. Land"
Results 81 - 100
of 8,222
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2006, 12:49 pm
Debro v. [read post]
26 Nov 2016, 1:32 pm
Land v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 10:35 am
Oral Argument in case# 11-2374; Chicago Title Land T v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 8:46 am
Matthew T. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 5:30 pm
In Save Panoche Valley et al. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 2:31 pm
The backlash against the Supreme Court’s decision in Kelo v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 5:43 pm
BLNR and Contested Cases The ICA decided Bart v. [read post]
24 Jul 2006, 6:16 pm
It's a need we didn't even know we had a year ago. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 9:59 pm
Florida Dep't of Environmental Protection, 130 S. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 12:00 am
Keys Citizens for Responsible Gov’t, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 7:31 pm
" And if so, then isn't title to these lands necessarily clouded long before this case? [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 2:51 pm
However, section 55(2) uses the phrase “liens registered against a parcel of land”, and a lien involving Crown land isn’t registered against the land, it’s registered against the owner’s holdback. [read post]
20 Jul 2019, 1:01 am
The Eagle has landed. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 3:25 am
Defendant’s argument that he was actually going slower than the officer projected was based on a land surveyor’s opinion from the video, but the land surveyor wasn’t called as a witness. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 10:11 am
Courts are increasingly receptive to evidence necessary to support traditional land claims, but which historically has not been considered admissible: in Roy Sesana v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 8:17 am
The government can’t deny safety benefits to kids at a Lutheran school simply because their school is religious – or else it can expect a hard landing at the Supreme Court. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:28 am
We predicted the Supreme Court wasn't finished with judicial takings or judicial takings-like issues after its decision (or, more accurately, non-decision) in Stop the Beach Renourishment v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 12:21 pm
Wilson, et al. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 5:58 am
A party seeking to establish such an implied dedication and thereby successfully challenge the alienation of the land must show that: (1) ‘[t]he acts and declarations by the land owner indicating the intent to dedicate his land to the public use [are] unmistakable in their purpose and decisive in their character to have the effect of a dedication’ and (2) that the public has accepted the land as dedicated to a public use (Niagara Falls… [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 9:48 pm
Office of Hawaiian Office of Hawaiian Affairs v. [read post]
