Search for: "AW v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 1,150
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2023, 7:57 am by Roger Parloff
I described then the legal landscape in which their motions to transfer venue are playing out, which is largely set by the District of Columbia Circuit’s binding, en banc 1976 ruling in United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
New on the Short Circuit podcast: bags of dope, unlawful assembly, and an invitation to assemble in centennial celebration of one of the most sweeping defenses of individual liberty in history, Meyer v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 3:33 am by SHG
Sure, you think conversion therapy is awful and deserves to be prohibited. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
AW Rev. 389-407 (1992); Judge Edwards' Indictment of 'Impractical' Scholars: The Need for a Bill of Particulars, 91 MICH. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 5:53 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Beham, The German-Polish Cultural Property Debate – Can Pragmatic Solutions Overcome a Convoluted Controversy Jan Barcz, The Polish-German Border in the Light of the 2+4 Treaty and the Polish-German Treaty on the Confirmation of the Border between Them Władysław Czapliński, State Boundaries and Third States – Issue of Opposability. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am by David Kopel
Supreme Court affirmed in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 9:18 am by Florian Mueller
First, legislative measures like the DMA, regulatory intervention such as the ongoing DG COMP investigation of the Google Play Store, and litigation (in less than a week, the Ninth Circuit will hear Epic v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:22 am by Eric Goldman
Most judges understand this distinction intuitively because they learned as 1Ls that the Constitution only restricts state action, not private action. [read post]
17 Sep 2022, 7:36 am by Eric Goldman
[The Internet you know and love is on life support after an awful NetChoice v. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 3:16 am by Florian Mueller
"That reminded me of a passage from Qualcomm's reply brief in support of its Ninth Circuit appeal of the district court's FTC decision:"See United States v. [read post]