Search for: "Abbott v. Superior Court"
Results 81 - 100
of 205
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2009, 6:00 pm
Superior Court (1985) 167 Cal.App.3d 878, the Court of Appeal held that if the plaintiff's route to liability was market share theory, he or she couldn't recover punitive damages. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 6:14 am
Clark County Superior Court Judge Vicki Carmichael said yesterday that she and her colleagues were pleased. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 10:31 am
Superior Court of Fresno County (Selma II) case out of the Fifth District Court of Appeal filed on April 26, 2012. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 10:56 am
As one Superior Court judge commented: “Before revision [in 2013], Civil Code section 841 really did little to guide the parties or the courts in resolving disputes. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 3:00 am
(C071785; 39 Cal.App.5th 708; Yolo County Superior Court; CVCV091258.) [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
In Eisai Co. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
As the Court put the point in 1989 in Rodriguez de Quijas v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:03 pm
Superior Court (1999) 19 Cal.4th 952, 966–967; Ehrlich v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
(C071785; 39 Cal.App.5th 708; Yolo County Superior Court; CVCV091258.) [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 10:47 am
Superior Court); and mitigation requirements (City of San Diego v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 6:02 am
’ ” Abbott Laboratories v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 6:19 am
Because the court was able to decide the class certification motion on the issues of predominance and superiority, it did not engage in an analysis of Rule 23(a) factors or have to construe the Supreme Court's Wal-Mart v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
(C071785; 39 Cal.App.5th 708; Yolo County Superior Court; CVCV091258.) [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 8:52 am
In the Supreme Court case of Bragdon v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 10:34 am
Significantly, the court went on to disapprove the court of appeal decisions in Resources Defense Fund v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 10:06 pm
(F073634; nonpublished opinion; Stanislaus County Superior Court; 2006153.) [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 12:18 pm
(G049691; 236 Cal.App.4th 1341; Orange County Superior Court; 30-2012-00593557.) [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 9:00 pm
The Superior Court denied the claim for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, but the Court of Appeal reversed citing the analysis of exhaustion in CEQA exemption cases in Azusa Land Reclamation Co. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 11:16 am
In Schutte & Koerting v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 7:00 am
Superior Court (1980) 108 Cal.App.3d 758, 767.) [read post]
