Search for: "Acuff v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 146
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2014, 3:51 am
The case is Kristina Hill, Brian Edwards and Thomas Privitere v Public Advocate of the United States, Civil Action No. 12-cv-02550-WYD-KMTBrian Edwards and Thomas Privitere became engaged in December 2009. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in Campbell v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:09 am
Whereas Weird Al’s Grammy-winning song fits snugly within the parody definition (and Yankovic always seeks permission, in order “to maintain relationships”), Dumb Starbucks position is questionable.ParodyIn the landmark decision addressing fair-use in Campbell v Acuff-Rose Music, Inc the US Supreme Court stated that parody "is the use of some elements of a prior author's composition to create a new one that, at least in… [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
In Fisher v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 12:51 am
The Ninth Circuit arguably erred because, while relying on the US Supreme Court’s decision in Campbell v Acuff-Rose Music (92-1292), 510 US 569 (1994), it overlooked the part of Campbellin which the majority stated that the defence of fair use may apply to a satire if “there is little or no risk of market substitution [of the original work with the later work], whether because of the large extent of transformation of the earlier work, . . . [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 3:30 pm
One of the most important, if not the most important, United States copyright cases decided in 2013 is The Authors Guild, Inc. v Google Inc. 2013 WL 6017130 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 11:50 am
Seuss Enterprises, LP v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 7:57 am
” Estate of Acuff v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 8:00 am
Acuff Rose Music, Inc. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 8:00 am
Acuff Rose Music, Inc. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 4:56 am
Cariou v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 11:07 am
”6 In support, he cites Eldred v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 10:25 am
Acuff-Rose, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 (1994), which held that an alleged rap parody of the popular song Pretty Woman could qualify as a parody protected by the copyright fair use doctrine. [read post]
17 May 2013, 1:37 am
Instead, ´what is critical is how the work in question appears to the reasonable observer’ (following Campbell v Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 (1994) and Leibovitz v Paramount Pictures Corp., 137 F.3d 109, 113-14 (2d Cir 1998). [read post]
15 May 2013, 9:45 am
Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569, 579 (1994). [read post]
6 May 2013, 6:40 pm
In Sony v. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 11:53 pm
By Gretchen Goetz and Helena Bottemiller By March of last year, lean finely textured beef (LFTB) had reached celebrity status under the unfavorable moniker “pink slime. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 7:18 am
When the Supreme Court re-calibrated the fair use analysis to focus on transformativeness in Campbell v. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 3:46 pm
Acuff-Rose Music (the “Pretty Woman” case) but no judges have, up till now, taken the hint. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 9:46 am
Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569, 590 (1994). [read post]
