Search for: "Adams v. Green" Results 81 - 100 of 445
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2021, 11:51 am by admin
Back in 2008, Professor Michael Green wrote an interesting paper on apportionment in asbestos litigation. [read post]
25 Nov 2017, 6:12 am by Garrett Hinck
Marshals Service related to his arrest and forced witness testimony before the military commission trying U.S. v. al-Nashiri. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 10:59 pm by Graeme Hall
See our previous post on Greens and MT v UK, as well as our most recent summary of the ongoing prisoner voting issue. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 11:35 pm by Jeff Gamso
  John Adams put it well.Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.Schooling ought not, as I suggested in the first point, be all about passing on information. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 3:07 pm by Nick Harrell
Field, 13 Green Bag 2d 465, by Adam Aft, Ross E. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
In the big news of the day, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in EEOC v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 7:51 am by Thomas Hopson
Rumsfeld, Rumsfeld v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 12:56 am by Melina Padron
 As pointed out by Adam Wagner, the Green Paper also involves a consultation on the proposals, and responses can be sent via email by Friday 6 January 2012. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 11:04 am by Dennis Crouch
(Arti Rai, Todd Rakoff, Kali Murray, Scott Kieff)  Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 8:36 am by Amanda Rice
Briefly: At Balkinization, Jamal Greene discusses Justice Thomas’s possible views on the Court’s 1944 decision in Korematsu v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: For The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports on the experience of an Ohio voter whose “occasional decisions not to vote had led election officials to strike his name from the voting rolls,” noting that in Husted v. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 4:13 am by Edith Roberts
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman examines how the parties in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]