Search for: "Agilent Technologies Inc."
Results 81 - 100
of 120
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2011, 5:19 am
Filed June 16, 2011, by Boxbe Inc. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 5:19 am
Filed June 16, 2011, by Boxbe Inc. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:32 am
Invest In Kayak.com [1] Investment, Series B 0 $18,500,000 2004-12-30 Kayak.com General Catalyst And American Online Invest In Kayak [1] Investment, Series A 0 not disclosed 2003-04-02 ProductFactory Agile Software Corporation (NASDAQ: AGIL) Acquires ProductFactory Acquisition 1 $4,300,000 2002-12-16 Northstar Technologies Brunswick Corporation (NYSE: BC) Acquires Northstar Technologies Acquisition 1 not disclosed TOTAL acquisitions by… [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 11:03 pm
ECORE International, et al (Patents Post Grant Blog) BPAI expands the reach of Agilent doctrine in Ex Parte Smart: Agilent Technologies v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 9:48 am
In Agilent Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:10 am
(here), the Federal Circuit applied a non-traditional test in its interference-in-fact analysis, and in Agilent Technologies Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 2:59 am
Findings will also be submitted to a peer-reviewed publication.The new test requires the use of a mass spectrometer to analyze food samples, and the lab got a big boost recently with the donation of a new high-end mass spectrometer from Agilent Technologies, Inc. [read post]
26 May 2010, 5:42 am
Breg, Inc., 2009 U.S. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:18 am
(Worcester, MA) Agile Design Solutions, Inc. [read post]
18 May 2010, 2:13 pm
The complaint and proposed consent order, In the Matter of Agilent Technologies, Inc., FTC File No. 0910135, announced May 14, 2010, are available on the FTC website. [read post]
12 May 2010, 1:45 pm
Feb. 16, 2010). http://tinyurl.com/yb5p3ge Star Direct Telecom, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 9:55 pm
Patent and Trademark Office cancelled Rule 41.200(b) as a result of the decision rendered in Agilent Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 5:33 am
In Agilent Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 8:10 am
Agilent Technologies, Inc, v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 10:12 am
Agilent Technologies Inc. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 7:29 pm
Agilent Technologies' patent claim was directed to an apparatus for preparing an array of chemical compounds on a surface. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 11:44 pm
Morgan and three other engineers invented a defibrillator that resulted in 6,241,751, which was originally assigned to Agilent Technologies before landing in Philips' hands. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 1:01 pm
NACCO Industries Inc. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Group, Inc v Jungle Networks, Inc (Gray on Claims) BPAI holds term indefinite and summarizes reasoning behind broadest reasonable interpretation rule: Ex parte Senju Metal Industry Co (Gray on Claims) US Patents - Lawsuits and strategic steps Amkor Technology - ITC issues supplemental initial determination finding non-invalidity under 35 USC §§ 102(g) and 103(a) of certain asserted patent claims in investigation concerning Carsem's importation and sale of… [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Group, Inc v Jungle Networks, Inc (Gray on Claims) BPAI holds term indefinite and summarizes reasoning behind broadest reasonable interpretation rule: Ex parte Senju Metal Industry Co (Gray on Claims) US Patents - Lawsuits and strategic steps Amkor Technology - ITC issues supplemental initial determination finding non-invalidity under 35 USC §§ 102(g) and 103(a) of certain asserted patent claims in investigation concerning Carsem's importation and sale of… [read post]
