Search for: "Akins v. States of California"
Results 81 - 100
of 568
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2015, 8:25 am
Regents of UC, Feb. 20, 2015, California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division One More Blog Entries: Halvorson v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:50 am
Riley v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 3:19 pm
We have already seen this phenomenon at work in other states with marriage amendments, where courts are trying to figure out whether the amendment precludes public employers from providing domestic partnership benefits because that would be akin to recognizing a status "similar to marriage" for unmarried couples. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 3:23 pm
After the California energy crisis in 2000-2001, state and individual energy consumers ("Ratepayers") sued Reliant Energy and other California energy providers in California state court for conspiracy to fix the price of wholesale electricity. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 1:41 am
State of California ex rel. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 9:06 pm
The following argument preview was written by Howard Jacobson, a partner in Akin Gump's DC office. [read post]
2 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
Indeed, the Supreme Court in 1975 in Taylor v. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 5:08 pm
Last week, however, in Moeller v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 1:05 pm
People of the State of California v. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 1:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 2:52 am
There is no clear law to apply to such questions – interstate disputes are governed by federal common law – and Rhode Island v. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 11:48 am
I will comment on the Cohen holding, but I also want to offer some thoughts as to why this divergence between California's highest court and the other courts throughout the state might be happening. [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 12:11 pm
Bowers v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 7:12 pm
Justice Sotomayor wondered whether this case was akin to Leonard v. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 5:55 am
Rosen, Gregory V. [read post]
30 May 2010, 3:55 pm
Independent Living Center of Southern California and PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 8:05 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 10:59 am
California, 547 U.S. 843, 850 (2006), the United States Supreme Court held that: [P]arolees are on the "continuum" of state-imposed punishments. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 7:23 am
She relied on two California appellate decisions, Hudgins v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 8:43 am
Padilla One More Time: Facebook Isn’t a State Actor–Atkinson v. [read post]
