Search for: "Alaska State Federation of Labor v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 136
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
[Max is $2,931/month] [NOTE: In Alaska, the amount will be $2,490.00 as of July 1, 2015. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 11:35 am by National Indian Law Library
United States (health care services, federal breach of contract)* State Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/currentstate.htmCases featured:Stephens v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 9:00 am by P. Andrew Torrez
Whistleblower Paul Blakeslee was awarded $3.4 million from an Alaska federal court jury in his retaliation and age discrimination claims against Shaw Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 12:33 pm by Steve Davies
SENTELLE, Chief Judge: The Native Village of Point Hope, Alaska, petitions this court for reimbursement of attorneys’ fees and costs surrounding the case of Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:08 am by Heidi Henson
The complaint, filed in the federal district court in Portland, asks the court to declare recent DOL regulations prohibiting back-of-the-house (kitchen) workers from sharing in tips left by customers unlawful and inapplicable to restaurants that pay employees who share the tips at least the federal or the applicable (if higher) state minimum wage with no tip credit. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 9:32 am by David Urban
”  It covers other states as well, including Arizona, Nevada, Hawaii, and Alaska. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 11:22 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
SBCs Required By 1st Day Of 1st Enrollment Period Beginning After September 22, 2012 Health Plan-U Coping With Health Care Reform Workshop Series Provide Timely Updates Beginning July 24 The June 28, 2012 Supreme Court National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 11:52 am by admin
”  Numerous other federal and state statutes (including Alaska’s) would also define these homes as “institutions. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 11:02 am by Kiera Flynn
SmithKline Beecham Corp.Docket: 11-204Issue(s): (1) Whether deference is owed to the Secretary of Labor's interpretation of the Fair Labor Standards Act's outside sales exemption and related regulations; and (2) whether the Fair Labor Standards Act's outside sales exemption applies to pharmaceutical sales representatives.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (9th Cir.)Petition for certiorariAmicus brief of U.S. [read post]