Search for: "All Gibson Plaintiffs"
Results 81 - 100
of 529
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2019, 6:21 am
Glazer, for plaintiff-appellant. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 8:54 pm
Indeed, this has been a large part of my career, going back to my time at Gibson, Dunn and DLA Piper. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 9:52 pm
But Judge Grimm’s decision could have significant ramifications for plaintiffs filing securities-related and other class actions following data breaches at retail companies. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 9:45 am
The jury believed the plaintiffs. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 6:00 am
With all the benefits that hindsight provides, derivative plaintiffs will more frequently contend that a board lacked procedures to monitor “central compliance risks” that were “essential and mission critical. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
After all, a decade-and-a-half ago, inVieth v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
While reliable assessments of the Court’s work product that wound down last week will require considerable time in the coming months spent carefully reading, rereading, analyzing, and discussing with other analysts all the opinions of all of the justices, it is never too early to begin collecting thoughts, reactions, and impressions. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 8:40 am
The plaintiffs in the libel suit were Gibson’s Bakery and its owners. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 5:02 am
If some shop loses business because people know the owner voted for Trump and that's their idea of racism and they go around telling each other not to shop in the store because it's owned by a racist, can the shop owner sue them all and win damages? [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 6:20 am
David Gibson is the lead plaintiff in the case and is the principal owner of the business. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 9:56 am
Supplement retailers are also under pressure from the Plaintiff’s bar. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:18 am
After all, aren’t all white people inherently racist? [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 11:36 pm
Secondly, Judge Gibson was satisfied that the defendant was motivated by her “hostility and ill will” towards the plaintiff. [read post]
22 May 2019, 9:01 pm
For his part, Justice Thomas for the majority acknowledges that “some plaintiffs, such as [Mr.] [read post]
14 May 2019, 8:27 am
The court ordered Sekumade to pay $3,000 in attorney's fees to Build by Owner's counsel within thirty days and to fully comply with all outstanding discovery requests within forty-five days or the court would require payment of an additional $10,000 in discovery sanctions and completion of forty hours of community service, and it would strike Sekumade's pleadings. [read post]
5 May 2019, 9:01 pm
In the Visa-MasterCard case, a class of plaintiff merchants accused Visa, MasterCard, and their member banks of antitrust violations arising out of interchange fees and the rules that they set for merchants that limited or eliminated competition (like anti-steering, no-surcharge rules, no-discounting rules, honor-all-cards rules, etc.). [read post]
3 May 2019, 10:14 am
THE CONSUMER “RIGHT TO KNOW” VERSUS THE FIRST AMENDMENTPanelists:– Johan Verheij Memorial Professor of Law and Director, Center for Business Law and Regulation, Case Western Reserve University School of Law, Cleveland OHRebecca Tushnet – Frank Stanton Professor of the First Amendment, Harvard Law School, Cambridge, MA– Partner, Appellate and Constitutional Law Group and Co-Chair, Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice Group, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher… [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 8:31 am
Reasonable billing judgments were exercised by all of Plaintiff's counsel. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 6:22 am
That is, why couldn’t a plaintiff own a trademark right in a concept, if in fact every implementation of that concept made people think that the implementation came from the trademark owner? [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 5:00 am
Feb. 28, 2019 Gibson, J.), the court denied a Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel a Defendant carrier in a bad faith claim to identify all bad faith suits in which it was involved over the preceding ten (10) years. [read post]
